Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Taxonomy and Identification of the Burkholderia cepacia Complex

Open access
Coenye, Tom, Vandamme, Peter, Govan, John R. W., LiPuma, John J.·2001·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

At the beginning of this review it is essential to clarify the terminology that will be used to refer to the members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex and their relatives.The name B. cepacia will relate only to B. cepacia genomovar I. Strains resembling B. cepacia may belong to the B. cepacia complex, to other Burkholderia species (for instance, Burkholderia gladioli), or to species from other genera (for instance, Ralstonia pickettii) that share some phenotypic or genotypic similarities with the B. cepacia complex.B. cepacia complex bacteria and organisms that may be confused with them will be altogether referred to as B. cepacia-like organisms.Most previous reports regarding these organisms were published before the recognition of the complicated taxonomic relationships between the different members of the B. cepacia complex; it is therefore unclear to what category the presumed B. cepacia isolates described would belong.For that reason, when such literature is cited, the name "B. cepacia" will be shown in double quotes.Chronic microbial colonization of the major airways, leading to exacerbations of pulmonary infection, is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).Typical CF pathogens include Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae (30).Other glucose nonfermenters, like Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Alcaligenes xylosoxidans, R. pickettii, and Burkholderia gladioli, can frequently be found as well, but their role in the decline of pulmonary function is unclear (14,19,30).Several reports on the recovery of "B.cepacia" from CF patients appeared in the late 1970s and early 1980s (62,63).The first detailed description of the clinical significance of "B.cepacia" colonization and infection was published in 1984 (47).In that seminal paper, Isles et al. documented the increasing prevalence of "B.cepacia" colonization and infection in the Toronto, Canada, CF treatment center and described the so-called "cepacia syndrome," a severe progressive respiratory failure with bacteremia that occurs in about 20% of all infected CF patients.Clustering of new cases in some centers and the decrease of colonization of new patients following segregation of colonized and noncolonized patients in other centers suggested that "B.cepacia" could be transmitted between CF patients.This was confirmed by several studies (34,64,67,76,84,94) that showed

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.39.10.3427-3436.2001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
Coenye, T., Vandamme, P., Govan, J. R. W., & LiPuma, J. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2001-10
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
3427-3436
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2130952076
Cited by
432
References
0
FWCI
24.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Taxonomy and Identification of the Burkholderia cepacia Complex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.39.10.3427-3436.2001
The paper
Coenye, T., Vandamme, P., Govan, J. R. W., & LiPuma, J. J. (2001). Taxonomy and Identification of the Burkholderia cepacia Complex. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.39.10.3427-3436.2001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.