The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Production of plant growth modulating volatiles is widespread among rhizosphere bacteria and strongly depends on culture conditions
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Recent studies have suggested that bacterial volatiles play an important role in bacterial–plant interactions. However, few reports of bacterial species that produce plant growth modulating volatiles have been published, raising the question whether this is just an anecdotal phenomenon. To address this question, we performed a large screen of strains originating from the soil for volatile‐mediated effects on Arabidopsis thaliana . All of the 42 strains tested showed significant volatile‐mediated plant growth modulation, with effects ranging from plant death to a sixfold increase in plant biomass. The effects of bacterial volatiles were highly dependent on the cultivation medium and the inoculum quantity. GC‐MS analysis of the tested strains revealed over 130 bacterial volatile compounds. Indole, 1‐hexanol and pentadecane were selected for further studies because they appeared to promote plant growth. None of these compounds triggered a typical defence response, using production of ethylene and of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as read‐outs. However, when plants were challenged with the flg‐22 epitope of bacterial flagellin, a prototypical elicitor of defence responses, additional exposure to the volatiles reduced the flg‐22‐induced production of ethylene and ROS in a dose‐dependent manner, suggesting that bacterial volatiles may act as effectors to inhibit the plant's defence response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures
Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x · Cited by 67,392
Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
Lugtenberg, B., & Kamilova, F. (2009) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918 · Cited by 3,987
Boller, T., & Felix, G. (2009) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346 · Cited by 3,387
Self-citationMicrobiology of the Phyllosphere
Lindow, S. E., & Brandl, M. T. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.4.1875-1883.2003 · Cited by 2,264
Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain of bacterial flagellin
Felix, G., Duran, J. D., Volko, S., & Boller, T. (1999) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00265.x · Cited by 1,715
Self-citationBacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis
Ryu, C.-M., Farag, M. A., Hu, C.-H., Reddy, M. S., Wei, H.-X., Paré, P. W., & Kloepper, J. W. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0730845100 · Cited by 1,656
Bacterial Volatiles Induce Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis
Ryu, C.-M., Farag, M. A., Hu, C.-H., Reddy, M. S., Kloepper, J. W., & Paré, P. W. (2004) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.103.026583 · Cited by 1,308
Boller, T., & He, S. Y. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1171647 · Cited by 1,081
Self-citationAn Elicitor of Plant Volatiles from Beet Armyworm Oral Secretion
Alborn, H. T., Turlings, T. C. J., Jones, T. H., Stenhagen, G., Loughrin, J. H., & Tumlinson, J. H. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5314.945 · Cited by 999
Bacterial volatiles: the smell of small organisms
Schulz, S., & Dickschat, J. S. (2007) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/b507392h · Cited by 892
Cited by
Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 · Cited by 3,308
Roles of indole as an interspecies and interkingdom signaling molecule
Lee, J.-H., Wood, T. K., & Lee, J. (2015) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.08.001 · Cited by 516
Intervention of Phytohormone Pathways by Pathogen Effectors
Kazan, K., & Lyons, R. (2014) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.114.125419 · Cited by 488
Meldau, D. G., Meldau, S., Hoang, L. H., Underberg, S., Wunsche, H., & Baldwin, I. T. (2013) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.113.114744 · Cited by 284
Bailly, A., Groenhagen, U., Schulz, S., Geisler, M., Eberl, L., & Weisskopf, L. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12666 · Cited by 207
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Blom, D., Fabbri, C., Connor, E. C., Schiestl, F. P., Klauser, D. R., Boller, T., Eberl, L., & Weisskopf, L.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-09-20
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3047-3058
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2157962844
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 16.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Production of plant growth modulating volatiles is widespread among rhizosphere bacteria and strongly depends on culture conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02582.x
- The paper
- Blom, D., Fabbri, C., Connor, E. C., Schiestl, F. P., Klauser, D. R., Boller, T., Eberl, L., & Weisskopf, L. (2011). Production of plant growth modulating volatiles is widespread among rhizosphere bacteria and strongly depends on culture conditions. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02582.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
