The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multicenter Evaluation of Fully Automated BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube 960 System for Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Open accessAbstract
The reliability of the BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 system for testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis susceptibility to the three front-line drugs (isoniazid [INH], rifampin [RIF], and ethambutol [EMB]) plus streptomycin (STR) was compared to that of the BACTEC 460 TB system. The proportion method was used to resolve discrepant results by an independent arbiter. One hundred and ten strains were tested with an overall agreement of 93.5%. Discrepant results were obtained for seven strains (6.4%) with INH (resistant by BACTEC MGIT 960; susceptible by BACTEC 460 TB), for one strain (0.9%) with RIF (resistant by BACTEC MGIT 960; susceptible by BACTEC 460 TB), for seven strains (6.4%) with EMB (six resistant by BACTEC MGIT 960 and susceptible by BACTEC 460 TB; one susceptible by BACTEC MGIT 960 and resistant by BACTEC 460 TB), and for 19 strains (17.3%) with STR (resistant by BACTEC MGIT 960 and susceptible by BACTEC 460 TB). After resolution of discrepant results, the sensitivity of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system was 100% for all four drugs and specificity ranged from 89.8% for STR to 100% for RIF. Turnaround times were 4.6 to 11.7 days (median, 6.5 days) for BACTEC MGIT 960 and 4.0 to 10.0 days (median, 7.0 days) for BACTEC 460 TB. These data demonstrate that the fully automated and nonradiometric BACTEC MGIT 960 system is an accurate method for rapid susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Roberts, G. D., Goodman, N. L., Heifets, L., Larsh, H. W., Lindner, T. H., McClatchy, J. K., McGinnis, M. R., Siddiqi, S. H., & Wright, P. (1983) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.18.3.689-696.1983 · Cited by 309
Evaluation of rapid radiometric method for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Siddiqi, S. H., Libonati, J. P., & Middlebrook, G. (1981) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.13.5.908-912.1981 · Cited by 242
Cited by
Facing the Crisis: Improving the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in the HIV Era
Perkins, M. D., & Cunningham, J. (2007) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/518656 · Cited by 300
Drug-susceptibility testing in tuberculosis: methods and reliability of results
Kim, S. J. (2005) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00111304 · Cited by 285
Jha, H., Baveja, C. P., Kamal, V., Agarwal, P. N., Saxena, S., Dhakad, M. S., & Sharma, D. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1155/2023/3312250 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Bemer, P., Palicova, F., Rüsch-Gerdes, S., Drugeon, H. B., & Pfyffer, G. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 150-154
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2139352203
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter Evaluation of Fully Automated BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube 960 System for Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.40.1.150-154.2002
- The paper
- Bemer, P., Palicova, F., Rüsch-Gerdes, S., Drugeon, H. B., & Pfyffer, G. E. (2002). Multicenter Evaluation of Fully Automated BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube 960 System for Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.40.1.150-154.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.