The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drug-susceptibility testing in tuberculosis: methods and reliability of results
Open accessAbstract
The demand for reliable drug-susceptibility testing (DST) increases with the expansion of antituberculosis drug-resistance surveillance, and with the need for an appropriate treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, whose incidence gradually increases in many parts of the world. However, the reliability of DST results obtained through widely used methods does not meet acceptable levels, except for DST to isoniazid and rifampicin. In general, susceptibility results are highly predictable, while resistance results show low predictive values when the resistance prevalence is <10%. Poor reliability stems from a weak correlation with clinical response and a low reproducibility due to the poor standardisation of the complex and fragile test procedures. Therefore,in vitro criteria of resistance for susceptibility testing should be carefully determined with representative clinical samples of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from patients never treated with any antituberculosis drug, and from patients having failed treatment with a regimen containing the tested drug; DST should then be carefully standardised to obtain reproducible results. The critical concentration of some drugs is close to the minimal inhibitory concentration for wild susceptible strains and, thus, drug-susceptibility testing is prone to yield poorly reproducible results. These issues call for physicians' attention when using the results from drug-susceptibility testing for case management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Manual of Clinical Microbiology.
(1980) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-93-6-939_2 · Cited by 14,411
Palomino, J.-C., Martin, A., Camacho, M., Guerra, H., Swings, J., & Portaels, F. (2002) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.46.8.2720-2722.2002 · Cited by 1,229
(1969) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 765
Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in the world
Wilkinson, D. (1998) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.1016/s0035-9203(98)90766-0 · Cited by 700
Public Health Mycobacteriology
Kent, P. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 328
El-Hajj, H. H., Marras, S. A. E., Tyagi, S., Kramer, F. R., & Alland, D. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.39.11.4131-4137.2001 · Cited by 180
Bemer, P., Palicova, F., Rüsch-Gerdes, S., Drugeon, H. B., & Pfyffer, G. E. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.40.1.150-154.2002 · Cited by 173
Drug Susceptibility in the Chemotherapy of Mycobacterial Infections
Heifets, L. B., & Cynamon, M. H. (1991) · Cited by 152
(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 133
Pfyffer, G. E., Bonato, D. A., Ebrahimzadeh, A., Gross, W. M., Hotaling, J. E., Kornblum, J. S., Laszlo, A., Roberts, G. D., Salfinger, M., Wittwer, F., et al. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.37.10.3179-3186.1999 · Cited by 133
Cited by
Diagnosis and treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis
Jang, J. G., & Chung, J. H. (2020) · Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine · doi:10.12701/yujm.2020.00626 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, S. J.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 564-569
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2164179076
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug-susceptibility testing in tuberculosis: methods and reliability of results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.05.00111304
- The paper
- Kim, S. J. (2005). Drug-susceptibility testing in tuberculosis: methods and reliability of results. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00111304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.