The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Blood Culture Contamination: Persisting Problems and Partial Progress
Open accessAbstract
Although it has been widely appreciated for many years among physicians and microbiologists that blood cultures are among the most important laboratory tests performed in the diagnosis of serious infections (35), it has become equally apparent in more recent years that contaminated blood cultures are common (25, 42), enormously costly (3, 29), and frequently confusing for clinicians (1, 12, 14, 26). Clinical studies of bloodstream infections over 3 decades have provided guidelines for differentiating true pathogens from contaminants or organisms of unknown significance (14, 18, 41, 42); however, a true “gold standard” for differentiating pathogens from contaminants does not exist (4, 25). Moreover, the most common blood culture contaminants, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), which were almost always such several decades ago (18, 41), now are pathogens more frequently (19, 25, 26, 42), and judging the clinical significance of this group of microorganisms in blood has proven to be especially problematic (1, 11, 22, 24, 26, 42; S. J. Peacock, I. C. Bowler, and D. W. Crook., Letter, Lancet 346:191-192, 1995). This review focuses on how pathogen-contaminant decisions are made, the phenomenon of increasing contamination of blood cultures, potential methods for addressing high contamination rates, and practical laboratory approaches to the workup of likely contaminants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
New developments in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections
Peters, R. P., van Agtmael, M. A., Danner, S. A., Savelkoul, P. H., & Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C. M. (2004) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(04)01205-8 · Cited by 398
Yanagihara, K., Kitagawa, Y., Tomonaga, M., Tsukasaki, K., Kohno, S., Seki, M., Sugimoto, H., Shimazu, T., Tasaki, O., Matsushima, A., et al. (2010) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc9234 · Cited by 104
Turner, R. B., Valcarlos, E., Won, R., Chang, E., & Schwartz, J. (2016) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00439-16 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Weinstein, M. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2275-2278
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W1973287182
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood Culture Contamination: Persisting Problems and Partial Progress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.41.6.2275-2278.2003
- The paper
- Weinstein, M. P. (2003). Blood Culture Contamination: Persisting Problems and Partial Progress. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.41.6.2275-2278.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.