The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibiotic Susceptibilities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Derived from Patients with Cystic Fibrosis under Aerobic, Anaerobic, and Biofilm Conditions
Open accessAbstract
Recent studies have determined that Pseudomonas aeruginosa can live in a biofilm mode within hypoxic mucus in the airways of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). P. aeruginosa grown under anaerobic and biofilm conditions may better approximate in vivo growth conditions in the CF airways, and combination antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobically and biofilm-grown isolates may be more relevant than traditional susceptibility testing under planktonic aerobic conditions. We tested 16 multidrug-resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa derived from CF patients using multiple combination bactericidal testing to compare the efficacies of double and triple antibiotic combinations against the isolates grown under traditional aerobic planktonic conditions, in planktonic anaerobic conditions, and in biofilm mode. Both anaerobically grown and biofilm-grown bacteria were significantly less susceptible ( P < 0.01) to single and combination antibiotics than corresponding aerobic planktonically grown isolates. Furthermore, the antibiotic combinations that were bactericidal under anaerobic conditions were often different from those that were bactericidal against the same organisms grown as biofilms. The most effective combinations under all conditions were colistin (tested at concentrations suitable for nebulization) either alone or in combination with tobramycin (10 μg ml −1 ), followed by meropenem combined with tobramycin or ciprofloxacin. The findings of this study illustrate that antibiotic sensitivities are dependent on culture conditions and highlight the complexities of choosing appropriate combination therapy for multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa in the CF lung.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are linked to phenotypic variation
Drenkard, E., & Ausubel, F. M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416740a · Cited by 997
Cited by
Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms
Høiby, N., Bjarnsholt, T., Givskov, M., Molin, S., & Ciofu, O. (2010) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.011 · Cited by 3,225
Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens
De Oliveira, D. M. P., Forde, B. M., Kidd, T. J., Harris, P. N. A., Schembri, M. A., Beatson, S. A., Paterson, D. L., & Walker, M. J. (2020) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00181-19 · Cited by 2,078
Magalhães, A. P., Lopes, S. P., & Pereira, M. O. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.02146 · Cited by 578
Applying insights from biofilm biology to drug development — can a new approach be developed?
Bjarnsholt, T., Ciofu, O., Molin, S., Givskov, M., & Høiby, N. (2013) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4000 · Cited by 516
Biofilm-Specific Antibiotic Resistance
Mah, T.-F. (2012) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.12.76 · Cited by 504
Metadata
- Authors
- Hill, D., Rose, B., Pajkos, A., Robinson, M., Bye, P., Bell, S., Elkins, M., Thompson, B., MacLeod, C., Aaron, S. D., & Harbour, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5085-5090
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2096675722
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibiotic Susceptibilities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Derived from Patients with Cystic Fibrosis under Aerobic, Anaerobic, and Biofilm Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.43.10.5085-5090.2005
- The paper
- Hill, D., Rose, B., Pajkos, A., Robinson, M., Bye, P., Bell, S., Elkins, M., Thompson, B., MacLeod, C., Aaron, S. D., & Harbour, C. (2005). Antibiotic Susceptibilities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Derived from Patients with Cystic Fibrosis under Aerobic, Anaerobic, and Biofilm Conditions. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.43.10.5085-5090.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.