Cited by 74Various Chemistry Research TopicsInnovative Teaching MethodsExperimental Learning in Engineering

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Virtual Lab Demonstrations Improve Students’ Mastery of Basic Biology Laboratory Techniques

Open access
Maldarelli, Grace A., Hartmann, Erica M., Cummings, Patrick J., Horner, Robert D., Obom, Kristina. M., Shingles, Richard, Pearlman, Rebecca S.·2009·Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education

Abstract

Biology laboratory classes are designed to teach concepts and techniques through experiential learning. Students who have never performed a technique must be guided through the process, which is often difficult to standardize across multiple lab sections. Visual demonstration of laboratory procedures is a key element in teaching pedagogy. The main goals of the study were to create videos explaining and demonstrating a variety of lab techniques that would serve as teaching tools for undergraduate and graduate lab courses and to assess the impact of these videos on student learning. Demonstrations of individual laboratory procedures were videotaped and then edited with iMovie. Narration for the videos was edited with Audacity. Undergraduate students were surveyed anonymously prior to and following screening to assess the impact of the videos on student lab performance by completion of two Participant Perception Indicator surveys. A total of 203 and 171 students completed the pre- and posttesting surveys, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed to compare student perceptions of knowledge of, confidence in, and experience with the lab techniques before and after viewing the videos. Eleven demonstrations were recorded. Chi-square analysis revealed a significant increase in the number of students reporting increased knowledge of, confidence in, and experience with the lab techniques after viewing the videos. Incorporation of instructional videos as prelaboratory exercises has the potential to standardize techniques and to promote successful experimental outcomes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jmbe.v10.99

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Committee on Undergraduate Biology Education to Prepare Research Scientists for the 21st Century, National Research Council2003BIO2010: transforming undergraduate education for future research biologistsNational Academy PressWashington, DC
  2. Handelsman J2003Teaching scientists to teach HHMI Bull 16 31http://www.hhmi.org/bulletin/pdf/june2003/Perspective.pdf.
  3. 10.1126/science.1096022 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1002/tea.3660290109 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Likert R1932A technique for measurement of attitudesArchives Psychol140155
  6. Shingles R, Feist T, Brosnan R2005The biomes of Homewood: interactive map softwareBioscene3131724

Metadata

Authors
Maldarelli, G. A., Hartmann, E. M., Cummings, P. J., Horner, R. D., Obom, K. M., Shingles, R., & Pearlman, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biology
  • Advanced Biotechnology Studies and
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Obom, Kristina. M.
Venue
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
Published
2009-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
51-57
ISSN
  • 1935-7877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-7885
OpenAlex
W2036936560
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Various Chemistry Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Experimental Learning in Engineering
Keywords
virtual laboratory, educational videos, student self-confidence, student knowledge, student perceptions, method standardization, undergraduate laboratory course, experiential learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review