Cited by 7Innovative Teaching MethodsScience Education and PedagogyLibrary Science and Information Literacy

A Simple Activity to Enhance the Learning Experience of Reading Primary Literature

Open access
Liao, Min-Ken·2017·Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education

Abstract

Countless studies have demonstrated the benefits and the importance of incorporating primary literature into undergraduate curriculum. However, even with regular exposures to primary literature, students still find the reading task confusing and frustrating. Most educators are conscientious about choosing realistically challenging research articles that match students’ abilities and knowledge, so the negative experiences students have had are more likely due to fear-based emotions than skills. To help students overcome the initial fear of reading a research article, I first presented to them just the title of the paper, with 3 guiding questions, and encouraged them to get into the journey of the researchers by prompting them to speculate “What must they have done to write a paper with such a title?” I gave students 10-15 minutes to reflect upon the title and to jot down the answers to the 3 guiding questions. Depending on the students, time and the paper, we did not always have a class discussion after the reflection, but we always had one after students read the paper. While reading the paper, students were reminded to compare the paper with the notes they jotted down before reading it. Students responded positively to this simple activity. Facing just the title of the paper is certainly less intimidating than combating the entire paper at once. Once the initial fear has overcome, the reading task becomes less daunting. This activity is simple, flexible, and easily implemented and surveys showed that it effectively enhanced students’ experience in reading primary literature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1211

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]Breakwell DP 2003 Using the primary literature in an allied health microbiology course Microbiol Educ 4 30 38 10.1128/154288103X14285806272391 23653551 PMC3633124 · DOI
  2. [3]Kozeracki CA Carey MF Colicelli J Levis-Fitzgerald M Grossel M 2006 An intensive primary-literature-based teaching program directly benefits undergraduate science majors and facilitates their transition to doctoral programs CBE Life Sci Educ 5 340 347 10.1187/cbe.06-02-0144 17146041 PMC1681356 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [7]Flores GE Bates ST Knights D Lauber CL Stombaugh J Knight R Fierer N 2011 Microbial biogeography of public restroom surfaces PLoS ONE 6 e28132 10.1371/journal.pone.0028132 22132229 PMC3223236 · DOI
  4. [8]Adler CJ Dobney K Weyrich LS Kaidonis J Walker AW Haak W Bradshaw CJA Townsend G Soltysiak A Alt KW Parkhill J Cooper A 2013 Sequencing ancient calcified dental plaque shows changes in oral microbiota with dietary shifts of the Neolithic and Industrial revolutions Nat Genet 45 450 455 10.1038/ng.2536 23416520 PMC3996550 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [9]Newton RJ McLellan SL Dila DK Vineis JH Morrison HG Eren AM Sogin ML 2015 Sewage reflects the microbiomes of human populations mBio 6 e02574 10.1128/mBio.02574-14 25714718 PMC4358014 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [10]Koeth RA Levison BS Culley MK Buffa JA Wang Z Gregory JC Org E Wu Y Li L Smith JD Tang WHW DiDonato JA Lusis AJ Hazen SL 2014 γ-butyrobetaine is a proatherogenic intermediate in gut microbial metabolism of L-carnitine to TMAO Cell Metab 20 799 812 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.10.006 25440057 PMC4255476 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Liao, M.-K.
Affiliations
Furman University (US)
Corresponding author
Liao, Min-Ken
Venue
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
Published
2017-04
Volume
18
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1935-7877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-7885
OpenAlex
W2624158651
Cited by
7
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Furman University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
undergraduate science education, reading comprehension strategies, guiding questions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review