Whole Genome Sequencing in the Undergraduate Classroom: Outcomes and Lessons from a Pilot Course
Open accessAbstract
The BIO2010 report challenged undergraduate institutions to prepare the next generation of researchers for the changing direction of biology that increasingly integrates advanced technologies, digital information, and large-scale analyses. In response, the Microbiology and Cell Science Department at the University of Florida developed a research-based course, “Bacterial Genome Sequencing.” The objectives were to teach undergraduates about genomics and original research by sequencing a bacterial genome, to develop scientific communication skills by writing and submitting the project results as a class effort, and to promote an interest in biological research, particularly genomics. The students worked together to sequence, assemble, and annotate the Enterobacter cloacae P101 genome. We assessed student learning, scientific communication skills, and student attitudes by a variety of methods including exams, writing assignments, oral presentations, pre- and postcourse surveys, and a final exit survey. Assessment results demonstrate student learning gains and positive attitudes regarding the course.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students experience cognitive gains from CUREs, including analyzing data, interpreting results, and increased content knowledge.
“Students experience cognitive gains, including analyzing data, interpreting results, and increased content knowledge (6–10, 17, 18).”
From Gains in Scientific Identity, Scientific Self-Efficacy, and Career Intent Distinguish Upper-Level CUREs from Traditional Experiences in the Classroom (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
CUREs provide a viable mechanism to foster the development of factors related to a student's academic success and retention in STEM.
“Studies investigating course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) suggest that CUREs provide a viable mechanism to foster the development of factors related to a student’s academic success and retention in STEM (6–10).”
From Gains in Scientific Identity, Scientific Self-Efficacy, and Career Intent Distinguish Upper-Level CUREs from Traditional Experiences in the Classroom (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
CUREs are gaining popularity and students perceive them as positive experiences and prefer them over traditional "cookbook" labs.
“CUREs are gaining popularity and students perceive them as positive experiences and prefer them over traditional “cookbook” labs (8, 15).”
From Gains in Scientific Identity, Scientific Self-Efficacy, and Career Intent Distinguish Upper-Level CUREs from Traditional Experiences in the Classroom (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Classroom-Based Science Research at the Introductory Level: Changes in Career Choices and Attitude
Harrison, M., Dunbar, D., Ratmansky, L., Boyd, K., & Lopatto, D. (2011) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.10-12-0151 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Newell, M. J., & Ulrich, P. N. (2022) · Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00051-22 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
MacDonald, H., & Bézaire, V. (2024) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00171.2023 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Drew, J. C., & Triplett, E. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Drew, Jennifer C.
- Venue
- Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-11
- ISSN
- 1935-7877 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-7885
- PMC
- PMC3577148
- OpenAlex
- W2134806335
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
- Keywords
- whole genome sequencing, undergraduate research, genomics education, Enterobacter cloacae, bacterial genome assembly, genome annotation, scientific communication skills, student attitudes, learning outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review