Cited by 283Science Education and PedagogyCareer Development and DiversityUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research

Classroom-Based Science Research at the Introductory Level: Changes in Career Choices and Attitude

Open access
Harrison, Melinda, Dunbar, David, Ratmansky, Lisa, Boyd, Kimberly, Lopatto, David·2011·CBE—Life Sciences Education

Abstract

Our study, focused on classroom-based research at the introductory level and using the Phage Genomics course as the model, shows evidence that first-year students doing research learn the process of science as well as how scientists practice science. A preliminary but notable outcome of our work, which is based on a small sample, is the change in student interest in considering different career choices such as graduate education and science in general. This is particularly notable, as previous research has described research internships as clarifying or confirming rather than changing undergraduates’ decisions to pursue graduate education. We hypothesize that our results differ from previous studies of the impact of engaging in research because the students in our study are still in the early stages of their undergraduate careers. Our work builds upon the classroom-based research movement and should be viewed as encouraging to the Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education movement advocated by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the National Science Foundation, and other undergraduate education stakeholders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1187/cbe.10-12-0151

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changing students' negative views of researchers/research careers is a likely required first step if such students are to be inspired to undertake undergraduate research experiences that can lead to research careers.

    “Changing students’ negative views of researchers/research careers is a likely required first step, if such students are to be inspired to undertake undergraduate research experiences that can lead to research careers (Harrison et al., 2011).”

    From CREATE Cornerstone: Introduction to Scientific Thinking, a New Course for STEM-Interested Freshmen, Demystifies Scientific Thinking through Analysis of Scientific Literature (2013) · cites this paper as Harrison et al., 2011

    The Results (Students Report a Change in Understanding about Research; page unavailable) report more positive attitudes toward science and research after students took a course-based research class. The paper does not establish that changing negative views is a required first step before students will undertake undergraduate research; in this study, the research experience preceded the change in attitudes. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brenner K Fueling education reform: BIO 2010—biology for the future Cell Biol Educ 2003 2 85 86 12888840 PMC162188
  2. Handelsman J Miller Sl Pfund C Scientific Teaching 2007 New York W.H. Freeman 19039122
  3. Lopatto D The essential features of undergraduate research Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, Spring 2003 2003 139 142

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, M., Dunbar, D., Ratmansky, L., Boyd, K., & Lopatto, D.
Affiliations
  • Cabrini University (US)
  • Grinnell College (US)
Corresponding author
Dunbar, David
Venue
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2011-09
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
279-286
ISSN
1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169289905
Cited by
283
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
38.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0715777)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
Keywords
classroom research, undergraduate research, introductory science courses, career choice, graduate education, student attitudes toward science, scientific method, first-year students
MeSH terms
Attitude, Bacteriophages, Career Choice, Curriculum, Data Collection, Education, Graduate, Research, Science, Students, Genomics, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review