The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Topology and Membrane Anchoring of the Coronavirus Replication Complex: Not All Hydrophobic Domains of nsp3 and nsp6 Are Membrane Spanning
Open accessAbstract
Coronaviruses express two very large replicase polyproteins, the 16 autoproteolytic cleavage products of which collectively form the membrane-anchored replication complexes. How these structures are assembled is still largely unknown, but it is likely that the membrane-spanning members of these nonstructural proteins (nsps) are responsible for the induction of the double-membrane vesicles and for anchoring the replication complexes to these membranes. For 3 of the 16 coronavirus nsps—nsp3, nsp4, and nsp6—multiple transmembrane domains are predicted. Previously we showed that, consistent with predictions, nsp4 occurs in membranes with both of its termini exposed in the cytoplasm (M. Oostra et al., J. Virol. 81:12323-12336, 2007). Strikingly, however, for both nsp3 and nsp6, predictions based on a multiple alignment of 27 coronavirus genome sequences indicate an uneven number of transmembrane domains. As a consequence, the proteinase domains present in nsp3 and nsp5 would be separated from their target sequences by the lipid bilayer. To look into this incongruity, we studied the membrane disposition of nsp3 and nsp6 of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and murine hepatitis virus by analyzing tagged forms of the proteins expressed in cultured cells. Contrary to the predictions, in both viruses, both proteins had their amino terminus, as well as their carboxy terminus, exposed in the cytoplasm. We established that two of the three hydrophobic domains in nsp3 and six of the seven in nsp6 are membrane spanning. Subsequently, we verified that in nsp4, all four hydrophobic domains span the lipid bilayer. The occurrence of conserved non-membrane-spanning hydrophobic domains in nsp3 and nsp6 suggests an important function for these domains in coronavirus replication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coronaviruses post-SARS: update on replication and pathogenesis
Perlman, S., & Netland, J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2147 · Cited by 1,764
Báez-Santos, Y. M., St. John, S. E., & Mesecar, A. D. (2015) · Antiviral Research · doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.12.015 · Cited by 854
Continuous and Discontinuous RNA Synthesis in Coronaviruses
Sola, I., Almazán, F., Zúñiga, S., & Enjuanes, L. (2015) · Annual Review of Virology · doi:10.1146/annurev-virology-100114-055218 · Cited by 643
Angelini, M. M., Akhlaghpour, M., Neuman, B. W., & Buchmeier, M. J. (2013) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00524-13 · Cited by 527
Oudshoorn, D., Rijs, K., Limpens, R. W. A. L., Groen, K., Koster, A. J., Snijder, E. J., Kikkert, M., & Bárcena, M. (2017) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01658-17 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Oostra, M., Hagemeijer, M. C., van Gent, M., Bekker, C. P. J., te Lintelo, E. G., Rottier, P. J. M., & de Haan, C. A. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Virology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-12-15
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 12392-12405
- ISSN
- 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5514
- OpenAlex
- W2108243013
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topology and Membrane Anchoring of the Coronavirus Replication Complex: Not All Hydrophobic Domains of nsp3 and nsp6 Are Membrane Spanning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jvi.01219-08
- The paper
- Oostra, M., Hagemeijer, M. C., van Gent, M., Bekker, C. P. J., te Lintelo, E. G., Rottier, P. J. M., & de Haan, C. A. M. (2008). Topology and Membrane Anchoring of the Coronavirus Replication Complex: Not All Hydrophobic Domains of nsp3 and nsp6 Are Membrane Spanning. Journal of Virology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01219-08
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.