The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative Analysis of Complete Genome Sequences of Three Avian Coronaviruses Reveals a Novel Group 3c Coronavirus
Open accessAbstract
In this territory-wide molecular epidemiology study of coronaviruses (CoVs) in Hong Kong involving 1,541 dead wild birds, three novel CoVs were identified in three different bird families (bulbul CoV HKU11 [BuCoV HKU11], thrush CoV HKU12 [ThCoV HKU12], and munia CoV HKU13 [MuCoV HKU13]). Four complete genomes of the three novel CoVs were sequenced. Their genomes (26,396 to 26,552 bases) represent the smallest known CoV genomes. In phylogenetic trees constructed using chymotrypsin-like protease (3CL pro ), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (Pol), helicase, spike, and nucleocapsid proteins, BuCoV HKU11, ThCoV HKU12, and MuCoV HKU13 formed a cluster distantly related to infectious bronchitis virus and turkey CoV (group 3a CoVs). For helicase, spike, and nucleocapsid, they were also clustered with a CoV recently discovered in Asian leopard cats, for which the complete genome sequence was not available. The 3CL pro , Pol, helicase, and nucleocapsid of the three CoVs possessed higher amino acid identities to those of group 3a CoVs than to those of group 1 and group 2 CoVs. Unique genomic features distinguishing them from other group 3 CoVs include a distinct transcription regulatory sequence and coding potential for small open reading frames. Based on these results, we propose a novel CoV subgroup, group 3c, to describe this distinct subgroup of CoVs under the group 3 CoVs. Avian CoVs are genetically more diverse than previously thought and may be closely related to some newly identified mammalian CoVs. Further studies would be important to delineate whether the Asian leopard cat CoV was a result of interspecies jumping from birds, a situation analogous to that of bat and civet severe acute respiratory syndrome CoVs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structural and Functional Basis of SARS-CoV-2 Entry by Using Human ACE2
Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Wu, L., Niu, S., Song, C., Zhang, Z., Lu, G., Qiao, C., Hu, Y., Yuen, K.-Y., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.045 · Cited by 2,892
Self-citationCoronaviruses post-SARS: update on replication and pathogenesis
Perlman, S., & Netland, J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2147 · Cited by 1,764
Coronavirus Genomics and Bioinformatics Analysis
Woo, P. C. Y., Huang, Y., Lau, S. K. P., & Yuen, K.-Y. (2010) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v2081803 · Cited by 913
Self-citationNovel human coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2): A lesson from animal coronaviruses
Decaro, N., & Lorusso, A. (2020) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108693 · Cited by 382
Bat Origins of MERS-CoV Supported by Bat Coronavirus HKU4 Usage of Human Receptor CD26
Wang, Q., Qi, J., Yuan, Y., Xuan, Y., Han, P., Wan, Y., Ji, W., Li, Y., Wu, Y., Wang, J., et al. (2014) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2014.08.009 · Cited by 296
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Woo, P. C. Y., Lau, S. K. P., Lam, C. S. F., Lai, K. K. Y., Huang, Y., Lee, P., Luk, G. S. M., Dyrting, K. C., Chan, K.-H., & Yuen, K.-Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Virology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2009-01-15
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 908-917
- ISSN
- 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5514
- OpenAlex
- W1993964516
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Analysis of Complete Genome Sequences of Three Avian Coronaviruses Reveals a Novel Group 3c Coronavirus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jvi.01977-08
- The paper
- Woo, P. C. Y., Lau, S. K. P., Lam, C. S. F., Lai, K. K. Y., Huang, Y., Lee, P., Luk, G. S. M., Dyrting, K. C., Chan, K.-H., & Yuen, K.-Y. (2009). Comparative Analysis of Complete Genome Sequences of Three Avian Coronaviruses Reveals a Novel Group 3c Coronavirus. Journal of Virology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01977-08
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.