Cited by 77Rabies epidemiology and controlPoxvirus research and outbreaksVirology and Viral Diseases

A new rabies vaccine based on a recombinant ORF virus (parapoxvirus) expressing the rabies virus glycoprotein

Open access
Amann, Ralf, Rohde, Jörg, Wulle, Ulrich, Conlee, Douglas, Raue, Rudiger, Martinon, Olivier, Rziha, Hanns-Joachim·2013·Journal of Virology

Abstract

The present study describes the generation of a new Orf virus (ORFV) recombinant, D1701-V-RabG, expressing the rabies virus (RABV) glycoprotein that is correctly presented on the surface of infected cells without the need of replication or production of infectious recombinant virus. One single immunization with recombinant ORFV can stimulate high RABV-specific virus-neutralizing antibody (VNA) titers in mice, cats, and dogs, representing all nonpermissive hosts for the ORFV vector. The protective immune response against severe lethal challenge infection was analyzed in detail in mice using different dosages, numbers, and routes for immunization with the ORFV recombinant. Long-term levels of VNA could be elicited that remained greater than 0.5 IU per ml serum, indicative for the protective status. Single applications of higher doses (10(7) PFU) can be sufficient to confer complete protection against intracranial (i.c.) challenge, whereas booster immunization was needed for protection by the application of lower dosages. Anamnestic immune responses were achieved by each of the seven tested routes of inoculation, including oral application. Finally, in vivo antibody-mediated depletion of CD4-positive and/or CD8-posititve T cell subpopulations during immunization and/or challenge infection attested the importance of CD4 T cells for the induction of protective immunity by D1701-V-RabG. This report demonstrates another example of the potential of the ORFV vector and also indicates the capability of the new recombinant for vaccination of animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.02470-12

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 77

Authors
Amann, R., Rohde, J., Wulle, U., Conlee, D., Raue, R., Martinon, O., & Rziha, H.-J.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (DE)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • Pfizer (Belgium) (BE)
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
2013-02
Volume
87
Issue
3
Pages
1618-1630
ISSN
  • 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5514
OpenAlex
W2071210190
Cited by
77
References
71
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Rabies epidemiology and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Poxvirus research and outbreaks
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
rabies vaccine, rabies virus glycoprotein, virus-neutralizing antibodies, protective immunity, booster vaccination, secondary immune response, oral immunization, CD4+ T cells, T cell depletion
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Viral, Antigens, Viral, Cats, Disease Models, Animal, Dogs, Drug Carriers, Female, Genetic Vectors, Glycoproteins, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Orf virus, Rabies, Rabies Vaccines, Rabies virus, Viral Envelope Proteins, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Survival Analysis, Mice, Antibodies, Neutralizing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review