Cited by 212Rabies epidemiology and controlVirology and Viral DiseasesAnimal Virus Infections Studies

An mRNA Vaccine Encoding Rabies Virus Glycoprotein Induces Protection against Lethal Infection in Mice and Correlates of Protection in Adult and Newborn Pigs

Open access
Schnee, Margit, Vogel, Annette B., Voss, Daniel, Petsch, Benjamin, Baumhof, Patrick, Kramps, Thomas, Stitz, Lothar·2016·PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Abstract

Rabies is a zoonotic infectious disease of the central nervous system (CNS). In unvaccinated or untreated subjects, rabies virus infection causes severe neurological symptoms and is invariably fatal. Despite the long-standing existence of effective vaccines, vaccine availability remains insufficient, with high numbers of fatal infections mostly in developing countries. Nucleic acid based vaccines have proven convincingly as a new technology for the fast development of vaccines against newly emerging pathogens, diseases where no vaccine exists or for replacing already existing vaccines. We used an optimized non-replicating rabies virus glycoprotein (RABV-G) encoding messenger RNA (mRNA) to induce potent neutralizing antibodies (VN titers) in mice and domestic pigs. Functional antibody titers were followed in mice for up to one year and titers remained stable for the entire observation period in all dose groups. T cell analysis revealed the induction of both, specific CD4+ as well as CD8+ T cells by RABV-G mRNA, with the induced CD4+ T cells being higher than those induced by a licensed vaccine. Notably, RABV-G mRNA vaccinated mice were protected against lethal intracerebral challenge infection. Inhibition of viral replication by vaccination was verified by qRT-PCR. Furthermore, we demonstrate that CD4+ T cells are crucial for the generation of neutralizing antibodies. In domestic pigs we were able to induce VN titers that correlate with protection in adult and newborn pigs. This study demonstrates the feasibility of a non-replicating mRNA rabies vaccine in small and large animals and highlights the promises of mRNA vaccines for the prevention of infectious diseases.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

A non-replicating, protamine-complexed mRNA vaccine encoding rabies virus glycoprotein induced neutralizing antibodies and T cells in mice and pigs, and protected mice against lethal intracerebral rabies challenge. Protection required CD4+ T cells during immunization, and adult and newborn pigs developed neutralizing titers above the WHO correlate of 0.5 IU/ml.

Key findings

  • Two 80 μg RABV-G mRNA vaccinations induced VN titers ≥0.5 IU/ml in all immunized mice (range 5.9–70.2 IU/ml); after doses ≥10 μg, 100% of C57BL/6 and 90% (29/32) of BALB/c mice seroconverted. Titers remained stable for about one year, with mean titers between 17 and 65 IU/ml for 20 μg, 80 μg, and Rabipur groups.
  • RABV-G mRNA induced antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. IFN-γ/TNFα-double-positive CD4+ T cells were higher after mRNA than Rabipur at 6 days after boost (mean 0.48% vs 0.091%) and at day 91 (mean 0.084% vs 0.034%).
  • All RABV-G mRNA and HDC vaccinated mice survived lethal intracerebral challenge with 40-fold LD50 CVS-11, while none of the buffer-treated mice survived. qRT-PCR showed viral N-protein RNA was suppressed below detection in all but one mRNA-vaccinated mouse.
  • CD4+ T cell depletion during immunization reduced mean VN titers to about 3 IU/ml versus about 50 IU/ml in CD4-intact mRNA-vaccinated mice, and all CD4-depleted mRNA-vaccinated mice died within 11 days after challenge. Adult and newborn pigs seroconverted above 0.5 IU/ml; newborn piglets given 80 μg had mean titers of 11.0 IU/ml at day 28 and 2.5 IU/ml at day 70, while 240 μg gave 56.8 IU/ml and 8.3 IU/ml, comparable to full-dose Rabipur.

Methods

  • Mice (BALB/c and C57BL/6, 6–8 weeks old) and domestic pigs (adult and newborn) were immunized intradermally with optimized non-replicating RABV-G mRNA complexed with protamine; controls included buffer, irrelevant mRNA, and licensed vaccines Rabipur or HDC.
  • Antibody responses were measured by FAVN test; T cell responses by intracellular cytokine staining and ELISPOT; CD4+ T cells were depleted with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody; mice were challenged intracerebrally with 40-fold LD50 CVS-11; viral N-protein RNA and TNFα mRNA in brains were quantified by qRT-PCR.
  • Statistical comparisons used Mann Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons tests.

Limitations

  • The paper states that one mRNA-vaccinated mouse had detectable viral N-protein RNA at day 6 and was non-protected, and that reduced TNFα mRNA levels in vaccinated brains were not statistically significant.
  • The paper notes that the 0.5 IU/ml threshold may be a surrogate for protection against natural peripheral rabies infection rather than the laboratory intracerebral challenge used here.
  • Evident from the text: this is a preclinical animal study; pigs were assessed for immunogenicity only, not challenge protection; group sizes were small; and no human efficacy or safety data are reported, although a phase I clinical study is mentioned as initiated.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004746

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

6 of 27 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationown data

    The finding on neutralizing antibodies indicates a comparable mode of action for the mRNA vaccine format as seen for cell-based vaccines and other vaccine formats.

    “Concerning the induction of neutralizing antibodies, this finding indicates a comparable mode of action for the mRNA vaccine format as seen for cell based vaccines and other vaccine formats [3,13].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] HCJ Ertl, 2009, Novel vaccines to human rabies, PLoS neglected tropical diseases source

      The Introduction and “Vaccines to Rabies Virus” section identify neutralizing antibodies against rabies glycoprotein as the key correlate of protection, and describe this principle across several vaccine formats. The paper does not discuss mRNA vaccines or establish that their mode of action is comparable to that of cell-based vaccines. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [13] R Amann, 2013, A new rabies vaccine based on a recombinant ORF virus (parapoxvirus) expressing the rabies virus glycoprotein, Journal of Virology source
  • Premisecitation

    The domestic pig is a large animal model that exhibits relevant physiological and anatomical similarities to humans.

    “We next analyzed immunogenicity in domestic pigs, a large animal model that exhibits relevant physiological and anatomical similarities to humans [44,45].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [44] F Meurens, 2012, The pig: a model for human infectious diseases, Trends Microbiol source
    • cites [45] KH Mair, 2014, The porcine innate immune system: an update, Dev Comp Immunol source
  • Findingown data

    Induced CD4+ T cells were higher than those induced by a licensed vaccine.

    “with the induced CD4+ T cells being higher than those induced by a licensed vaccine.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    RABV-G mRNA vaccinated mice were protected against lethal intracerebral challenge infection.

    “Notably, RABV-G mRNA vaccinated mice were protected against lethal intracerebral challenge infection.”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
      “The format conferred full protection in a stringent murine challenge model of intracerebral inoculation with rabies virus.”
    • Also stated in: § Protection against lethal intracerebral challenge in mice · plain
      “All RABV-G mRNA and HDC vaccinated mice were protected against lethal rabies virus challenge (Fig 3A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    CD4+ T cells are crucial for the generation of neutralizing antibodies.

    “Furthermore, we demonstrate that CD4+ T cells are crucial for the generation of neutralizing antibodies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
  • May combine two claims. 36
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Death commonly follows within an average survival time between 6 and 11 days after first symptomatic onset for furious or paralytic forms, leaving little time and extremely limited therapeutic options.

    “While incubation phases vary, death commonly follows within an average survival time between 6 and 11 days after first symptomatic onset for furious or paralytic forms, respectively, thus leaving little time and extremely limited therapeutic options [1,2].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] T Hemachudha, 2013, Human rabies: neuropathogenesis, diagnosis, and management, Lancet Neurology source
    • cites [2] S Pathak, 2014, Diagnosis, management and post-mortem findings of a human case of rabies imported into the United Kingdom from India: a case report, Virology Journal source

      The Background says clinical rabies is invariably fatal, and the Conclusion describes limited evidence for the Milwaukee Protocol’s efficacy. The Case presentation records one patient’s deterioration through day 10, but the paper does not give average survival times of 6 and 11 days after symptom onset for furious and paralytic rabies, respectively. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Novel vaccine formats such as subunit, DNA or viral vector vaccines have been assessed successfully for protective capacity against rabies infection in preclinical settings, but none resulted in a licensed product for human use yet.

    “Novel vaccine formats such as subunit, DNA or viral vector vaccines have been assessed successfully for their protective capacity against rabies infection in preclinical settings [3,13] but none of these resulted in a licensed product for human use yet.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] HCJ Ertl, 2009, Novel vaccines to human rabies, PLoS neglected tropical diseases source
    • cites [13] R Amann, 2013, A new rabies vaccine based on a recombinant ORF virus (parapoxvirus) expressing the rabies virus glycoprotein, Journal of Virology source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Benefits of mRNA vaccines are the induction of balanced and enduring immunity as demonstrated for anti-tumor and prophylactic vaccination, simple supply, and storage at elevated temperature.

    “Benefits are the induction of balanced and enduring immunity as demonstrated for anti-tumor and prophylactic vaccination [14–16], simple supply, and storage at elevated temperature, as reviewed elsewhere [17,18].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [14] I Hoerr, 2000, In vivo application of RNA leads to induction of specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and antibodies, Eur J Immunol source
    • cites [15] M Fotin-Mleczek, 2011, Messenger RNA-based vaccines with dual activity induce balanced TLR-7 dependent adaptive immune responses and provide antitumor activity, J Immunother source
    • cites [16] EJ Solari, 2012, Differentiating Literacy Growth of ELL Students With LD From Other High-Risk Subgroups and General Education Peers: Evidence From Grades 3–10, J Learn Disabil source
    • cites [17] K-J Kallen, 2013, A novel, disruptive vaccination technology: self-adjuvanted RNActive vaccines, Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics source
    • cites [18] T Kramps, 2013, Messenger RNA-based vaccines: progress, challenges, applications, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews RNA source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After vaccination with 20 μg and 80 μg RABV-G mRNA or with Rabipur, antibody titers remained stable throughout the observation period with mean titers between 17 and 65 IU/ml.

    “We found that after vaccination with 20 μg and 80 μg RABV-G mRNA or with Rabipur antibody titers remained stable throughout the observation period with mean titers between 17 and 65 IU/ml (Fig 1E).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In C57BL/6 mice, immunization with 10 μg RABV-G mRNA vaccine revealed comparable immunogenicity to HDC, and significantly higher titers were achieved at mRNA doses of ≥20 μg.

    “In C57BL/6 mice immunization with a dose of 10 μg RABV-G mRNA vaccine (range: 0.5 to 40.6 IU/ml) revealed comparable immunogenicity to HDC (range: 1.5 to 13.5 IU/ml) and significantly higher titers were achieved at mRNA doses of ≥20 μg (range: 17.8 to 92.4 IU/ml).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In both mouse strains, a dose-response correlation was seen and high neutralizing antibody titers were induced at doses ≥10 μg mRNA.

    “Thus, in both mouse strains, a dose-response correlation was seen and high neutralizing antibody titers were induced at doses ≥10 μg mRNA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    mRNA vaccination led to early, efficient viral clearance and brain homeostasis upon intracerebral infection.

    “Moreover, we demonstrate the early, efficient viral clearance and brain homeostasis by mRNA vaccination upon intracerebral infection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In splenocytes of RABV-G mRNA vaccinated mice, IFN-γ secreting cells were detected upon Rabipur stimulation, but not after stimulation with BSA or in splenocytes of buffer treated control mice.

    “This analysis revealed that in splenocytes of RABV-G mRNA vaccinated mice, IFN-γ secreting cells were detected upon Rabipur stimulation, but not after stimulation with BSA (negative control) or in splenocytes of buffer treated control mice (Fig 1B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the 1.25 μg and 5 μg mRNA vaccine doses, response onset was delayed, but caught up by week 12 and titers remained at a high level of ≥10 IU/ml.

    “For the 1.25 μg and 5 μg mRNA vaccine doses, response onset was delayed, but caught up by week 12 of the experiment and titers remained at a high level of ≥ 10 IU/ml.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the CD4-depleted mRNA-vaccinated group, all mice had to be sacrificed within 11 days after infection with similar kinetics as the negative control group.

    “In the CD4-depleted, mRNA vaccinated group, all mice had to be sacrificed within 11 days after infection with similar kinetics as in the negative control group”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All Rabipur-vaccinated undepleted positive control mice survived lethal i.c. CVS-11 challenge, while buffer-injected negative control mice had to be sacrificed by day nine post challenge due to dramatic weight loss.

    “All mice vaccinated with Rabipur (undepleted positive control) survived the challenge infection while buffer injected mice (negative controls) had to be sacrificed by day nine post challenge due to dramatic weight loss”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In buffer-treated BALB/c mice at day 3 after i.c. CVS-11 infection, low N-protein mRNA was detectable in the telencephalon (mean ct 31.4) but not the cerebellum; by day 6 high viral loads were detected in both telencephalon (mean ct 23.1) and cerebellum (mean ct 24.7).

    “At day 3 after infection a low quantity of N-protein mRNA was detectable in the telencephalon of animals treated with buffer (mean: 31.4 cycle threshold (ct)-value) whereas the cerebellum was negative for viral N-protein mRNA (mean above detection limit). Ct-values, however, decreased over the period of infection as at day 6 high viral loads were detected in both analyzed parts of the brains (mean”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In buffer-treated mice, viral replication was found in the telencephalon and spread to the cerebellum, and both regions showed increased TNFα expression.

    “In buffer-treated mice we found viral replication in the telencephalon (the site of injection) and spreading to the cerebellum. In addition, both telencephalon and cerebellum of these animals showed increased TNFα expression”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Inter-individual variability was low in all test groups.

    “Inter-individual variability was low in all test groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At day 9 after infection, first buffer treated mice had to be sacrificed due to pronounced weight loss (25% of initial body weight) and none in this group survived the infection.

    “In contrast, at day 9 after infection, first buffer treated mice had to be sacrificed due to pronounced weight loss (25% of initial body weight) and none in this group survived the infection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In CD4-depleted mRNA-immunized mice, VN titers were strongly reduced: 3/8 had titers below 0.5 IU/ml and the mean titer was about 3 IU/ml, more than 15-fold lower than the CD4-intact mRNA-vaccinated group.

    “In the CD4-depleted, mRNA immunized group VN titers were strongly reduced: 3 out of 8 mice showed VN titers below 0.5 IU/ml and the mean titer of the groups was about 3 IU/ml, i.e. more than 15-fold reduced compared to the CD4-intact, mRNA-vaccinated group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    In RABV-G mRNA and Rabipur vaccinated mice, TNFα mRNA transcript levels were reduced compared to mock-vaccinated controls at both analysis time points and brain sections, though not statistically significant.

    “In mRNA and Rabipur vaccinated mice TNFα mRNA transcript level was reduced compared to mock vaccinated control group at both analysis time points and different brain sections”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
      “Though not statistically significant, the data indicate a reduced innate inflammatory reaction”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In groups with an intact CD4+ T cell compartment during prophylactic immunization, more than 87% of mRNA-vaccinated mice survived infection; one of eight mRNA-immunized mice without detectable VN antibodies after immunization was sacrificed on day ten due to pronounced weight loss.

    “In groups with an intact CD4+ T cell compartment during prophylactic immunization, more than 87% of mRNA-vaccinated mice survived infection (one out of eight mRNA-immunized mice without detectable virus neutralizing antibodies after immunization had to be sacrificed on day ten due to pronounced weight loss)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Two mice treated with HDC showed a transient weight loss (10-20% of initial body weight), but survived the experiment.

    “Two mice treated with HDC showed a transient weight loss (10–20% of initial body weight), but survived the experiment (Fig 3B).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Eight weeks post second boost, RABV-G specific neutralizing antibodies in adult pigs had a mean titer of 2.9 IU/ml and were still above 0.5 IU/ml.

    “Eight weeks post second boost RABV-G specific neutralizing antibodies had a mean titer of 2.9 IU/ml and were still above the 0.5 IU/ml limit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In newborn piglets, neutralizing antibody titers after first vaccination were in the protective range and further increased after booster vaccination.

    “Furthermore, immunogenicity of the RABV-G mRNA was also investigated in newborn piglets, again showing neutralizing antibody titers after the first vaccination in the protective range that were further increased after the booster vaccination.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In adult pigs, titers reached the protective limit of ≥0.5 IU/ml after the first immunization and could be further increased by booster vaccination, then remaining stable throughout the experiment.

    “In adult pigs, titers reached the protective limit of ≥0.5 IU/ml after the first immunization and could be further increased by booster vaccination, then remaining stable throughout the experiment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The RABV-G mRNA vaccine was immunogenic upon two injections at microgram doses and induced virus neutralizing antibodies, antigen-specific CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells.

    “This mRNA vaccine encoding the Rabies virus glycoprotein was immunogenic upon two injections at microgram doses and resulted in the induction of virus neutralizing antibodies, antigen-specific CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells (Fig 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Piglets receiving 80 μg RABV-G mRNA developed mean protective titers of 11.0 IU/ml at day 28 and 2.5 IU/ml at day 70, while piglets immunized with 240 μg had higher mean antibody titers of 56.8 IU/ml at day 28 and 8.3 IU/ml at day 70, comparable to full doses of licensed human vaccine.

    “Piglets receiving 80 μg RABV-G mRNA developed mean protective titers of 11.0 IU/ml at day 28 and 2.5 IU/ml at day 70, while piglets immunized with the 240 μg dose revealed higher mean antibody titers of 56.8 IU/ml at day 28 and 8.3 IU/ml at day 70 that were comparable to those induced by full doses of the licensed human vaccine”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In India, more human fatalities are caused by rabies than in any other country, with an estimated 16,000 deaths in 2010.

    “In India, more human fatalities are caused by rabies than in any other country of the world with an estimated 16,000 deaths in the year 2010 alone [10].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] World Health O (2013) WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies. Second report. World Health Organization Technical Report Series: 1–139, back cover.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Despite the availability of effective vaccines, rabies infection continues to claim at least 55,000 human lives per year.

    “Despite the availability of effective vaccines, rabies infection continues to claim at least 55,000 human lives per year (WHO Weekly epidemiological record, No. 49/50, 2007), not counting the great excess of fatal infections in animals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites WHO Weekly epidemiological record, No. 49/50, 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All animal experiments were conducted according to German and Hungarian laws and guidelines for animal protection.

    “All animal experiments were conducted according to German and Hungarian laws and guidelines for animal protection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Experiments in Germany were approved by the regional council Tübingen (reference numbers FLI238/08, FLI242/09, FLI246/09, CUR 4-13).

    “Experiments in Germany were approved by the regional council Tübingen (reference numbers FLI238/08, FLI242/09, FLI246/09, CUR 4–13).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In case of initiation of vaccination after exposure, protection has first to be built up, which requires time, as done by PEP vaccination.

    “In contrast thereto, protection has first to be built up in case of initiation of vaccination after exposure to the rabies virus, which requires time, as it is done by PEP vaccination.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Anti-rabies serum antibodies were analyzed by FAVN test according to WHO protocol.

    “Anti-rabies serum antibodies were analyzed by FAVN test by Eurovir Hygiene-Institut, Luckenwalde, Germany according to WHO protocol [30].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] F Cliquet, 1998, Development of a fluorescent antibody virus neutralisation test (FAVN test) for the quantitation of rabies-neutralising antibody, Journal of Immunological Methods source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Effective immunological defense against rabies must intercept virus before productive neuronal infection.

    “As a consequence, effective immunological defense against rabies must intercept virus before productive neuronal infection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These experiments indicate comparable immunogenicity of the mRNA vaccine with licensed rabies vaccine and the general induction of specific immune response in mice.

    “These experiments, therefore, indicate comparable immunogenicity of the mRNA vaccine with licensed rabies vaccine and the general induction of specific immune response in mice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) is administered together with active PEP vaccination in suspected rabies exposure in rabies naïve individuals because protection takes time to build up.

    “That is the reason for the administration of rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) together with active PEP vaccination in the case of suspected rabies exposure in rabies naïve individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Protection is most effective when neutralizing antibodies and clearing T cells are already present in situ at the time of infection, which is the case after prophylactic vaccination.

    “This is most effective when the neutralizing antibodies and clearing T cells are already present in situ at the time of infection, which is the case after prophylactic vaccination.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Depletion of CD4+ T cells during immunization results in loss of protection against lethal challenge, indicating a need for T cell help in mounting a protective neutralizing antibody response.

    “Our finding that depletion of CD4+ T cells during the immunization phase results in a loss of protection against lethal challenge infection further indicates the need for T cell help in mounting a protective neutralizing antibody response.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The reduced TNFα mRNA expression in vaccinated mice indicates a reduced innate inflammatory reaction which might result in maintenance of brain homeostasis upon vaccination with RABV-G mRNA or licensed rabies vaccine.

    “Though not statistically significant, the data indicate a reduced innate inflammatory reaction which might result in the maintenance of brain homeostasis upon vaccination with RABV-G mRNA or licensed rabies vaccine.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These results indicate efficient RABV-G-specific T cell induction by RABV-G mRNA and better induction of CD4+ T cells by the mRNA vaccine compared to Rabipur.

    “These results indicate efficient RABV-G-specific T cell induction by RABV-G mRNA and better induction of CD4+ T cells by the mRNA vaccine compared to Rabipur.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Intracerebral infection forms the basis of the widely used NIH potency test for rabies vaccines.

    “Importantly, it also forms the basis of the widely used National Institutes of Health (NIH) potency test for rabies vaccines [40].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] F.-X. KMM Meslin, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    T cells do not prevent initial viral infection of host cells, but provide important impact on rabies virus clearance in mice.

    “Although T cells do not prevent initial viral infection of host cells, they provide important impact on rabies virus clearance in mice [38].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] TJ Wiktor, 1978, Cell-mediated immunity and postexposure protection from rabies by inactivated vaccines of tissue culture origin, Developments in Biological Standardization
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Rabies-specific T cell clones have been isolated from human vaccinees.

    “Rabies-specific T cell clones have also been isolated from human vaccinees [39].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] E Celis, 1988, Genetic restriction and fine specificity of human T cell clones reactive with rabies virus, Journal of Immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The study further substantiated and extended previously published work on non-replicating influenza-specific mRNA vaccines, proving protective efficacy of mRNA vaccination in a second, harsh viral challenge model.

    “In summary, we further substantiated and extended previously published work on non-replicating influenza-specific mRNA vaccines [16], proving the protective efficacy of mRNA vaccination in a second, harsh viral challenge model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] EJ Solari, 2012, Differentiating Literacy Growth of ELL Students With LD From Other High-Risk Subgroups and General Education Peers: Evidence From Grades 3–10, J Learn Disabil source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The mRNA-based rabies vaccine is immunogenic and protective in animals.

    “In the present study, we demonstrated the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of an experimental mRNA-based rabies vaccine in animals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    A third vaccination did not result in a further strong titer increase, suggesting a maximal humoral immune response by the prime-boost strategy in pigs.

    “Interestingly, a third vaccination did not result in a further strong titer increase, suggesting a maximal humoral immune response by the prime-boost strategy in pigs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The data support and extend previous findings for mRNA vaccines against influenza in adult and newborn mice.

    “These data support and extend previous findings for mRNA vaccines against influenza in adult and newborn mice [16].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] EJ Solari, 2012, Differentiating Literacy Growth of ELL Students With LD From Other High-Risk Subgroups and General Education Peers: Evidence From Grades 3–10, J Learn Disabil source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rabies virus-induced encephalitis results in elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and increased TNFα and IFN-γ have been causally linked to increased BBB permeability allowing strong influx of immune factors.

    “It has been reported that rabies virus-induced encephalitis results in an elevation of different pro-inflammatory cytokines. Increased levels of TNFα and IFN-γ have been causally linked to increased BBB permeability which also allows the strong influx of immune factors [42,43].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [42] TW Phares, 2006, Regional differences in blood-brain barrier permeability changes and inflammation in the apathogenic clearance of virus from the central nervous system, Journal of Immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950) source
    • cites [43] A Solanki, 2009, Correlation of cytokine expression with rabies virus distribution in rabies encephalitis, Journal of Neuroimmunology source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    RABV-G vaccine is immunogenic in newborn piglets, leading to rapid seroconversion and indicating comparable VN titer kinetics for mRNA vaccine compared to licensed Rabipur vaccine.

    “These data demonstrate that RABV-G vaccine is immunogenic in newborn piglets, leading to rapid seroconversion and indicating comparable VN titer kinetics for mRNA vaccine compared to the licensed Rabipur vaccine.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
46 of 46
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Rabies virus infection in unvaccinated or untreated subjects is invariably fatal.

    “In unvaccinated or untreated subjects, rabies virus infection causes severe neurological symptoms and is invariably fatal.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Nucleic acid based vaccines are a proven technology for fast development of vaccines against newly emerging pathogens, diseases where no vaccine exists, or for replacing existing vaccines.

    “Nucleic acid based vaccines have proven convincingly as a new technology for the fast development of vaccines against newly emerging pathogens, diseases where no vaccine exists or for replacing already existing vaccines.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Virus neutralizing antibody titers above 0.5 IU/ml correlate with protection against rabies in adult and newborn pigs.

    “In domestic pigs we were able to induce VN titers that correlate with protection in adult and newborn pigs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Intracerebral infection is accepted by the scientific community as a stringent experimental test for rabies vaccines.

    “Intracerebral infection poses an extremely harsh challenge that is artificial, but accepted by the scientific community as a stringent experimental test.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Pre-existing immunity was not expected to affect experimental outcomes, especially in pigs.

    “Unlike in the case of influenza, pre-existing immunity was not expected to affect experimental outcomes especially in pigs.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The new mRNA vaccination strategy may be extended to the prophylaxis and treatment of infectious diseases in general.

    “further substantiate the assumption that this new vaccination strategy may be extended to the prophylaxis and treatment of infectious diseases in general.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prior unmodified mRNA vaccine approach was specifically optimized for intradermal administration and showed lower efficacy when given by the intramuscular route.

    “This approach was specifically optimized for i.d. administration and showed lower efficacy when given by the intramuscular route (i.m.) as preferred route for prophylactic vaccination, highlighting the important role of formulation in vaccine design.”

    From Unmodified mRNA in LNPs constitutes a competitive technology for prophylactic vaccines (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

    Materials and Methods (mRNA- and protein-based vaccines; page unavailable) says the vaccine contained no chemically modified nucleotides. The Immunizations procedure (page unavailable) says the mRNA vaccine was given intradermally, but describes no intramuscular mRNA group. The copy describes optimization of the mRNA and its formulation, not optimization specifically for intradermal delivery, and does not establish lower efficacy by the intramuscular route. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Non-replicating mRNA vaccines using exclusively unmodified nucleosides are immunogenic and capable of inducing protection against lethal rabies and influenza virus infections after intradermal vaccination in mice, rats, ferrets, and pigs.

    “Using exclusively unmodified nucleosides, we have demonstrated that non-replicating mRNA vaccines are immunogenic and capable of inducing protection against lethal rabies and influenza virus infections after intradermal vaccination (i.d.) in mice, rats, ferrets, and pigs.7,8”

    From Unmodified mRNA in LNPs constitutes a competitive technology for prophylactic vaccines (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

    Materials and Methods states that the rabies mRNA contained no chemically modified nucleotides and that mice and pigs received intradermal injections. The Abstract reports protection against lethal rabies challenge in mice, while the Results report protective-correlate antibody titers—not challenge-proven protection—in pigs. This paper does not establish the sentence’s influenza or rat and ferret claims. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both CVnCoV and CV2CoV are based on RNActive technology and consist of non-chemically modified sequence-engineered mRNA without pseudouridine.

    “Both CVnCoV and CV2CoV are based on RNActive technology4–7 and consist of non-chemically modified sequence-engineered mRNA without pseudouridine6–12.”

    From Optimization of non-coding regions for a non-modified mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    Materials and Methods (mRNA- and protein-based vaccines; page unavailable) says the rabies mRNA vaccines used the RNActive platform, had GC-enriched coding sequences and enhanced UTRs, and contained no chemically modified nucleotides. That supports the technology description, including the absence of pseudouridine, for the vaccines studied here. The paper does not identify CVnCoV or CV2CoV or establish that either has those properties. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previously, i.d. administration of protamine-formulated prophylactic mRNA vaccines based on unmodified nucleosides protected mice against influenza or rabies challenge infections and induced strong humoral responses in ferrets and pigs.

    “We have previously demonstrated that i.d. administration of protamine-formulated prophylactic mRNA vaccines based on unmodified nucleosides can protect mice against influenza or rabies challenge infections and induces also in ferrets and pigs strong humoral responses.7,8”
  • For the anti-rabies mAb, virus neutralization titers were comparable to those from an earlier active immunization study and above the protective level of 0.5 IU/ml as defined for humans at all mRNA doses tested but the lowest.

    “For the anti‐rabies mAb, the dose–response relationship was confirmed by analyzing virus neutralization titers which were comparable to those from an earlier active immunization study and above the protective level of 0.5 IU/ml as defined for humans at all mRNA doses tested but the lowest (Fig 3B; Schnee et al, 2016).”

    From mRNA mediates passive vaccination against infectious agents, toxins, and tumors (2017) · cites this paper as Schnee et al, 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting sample sizes for the brain qRT-PCR experiment

    Major

    The results say three animals per group were sacrificed at each time point, whereas the caption for that experiment reports four per group.

  • Low-dose antibody titers were not stable throughout observation

    Minor

    The abstract says titers remained stable for the entire observation period in all dose groups, but the results say responses at the 1.25 μg and 5 μg doses were delayed and did not catch up until week 12.

  • Cited newborn-mouse vaccine study is a literacy study

    Minor

    The text cites reference 16 for prior findings on vaccine immunogenicity in newborn mice, but the listed reference is about literacy growth in students.

  • CD4+ T-cell results point to the CD8+ panel

    Minor

    The text assigns the long-term CD4+ T-cell comparison to Fig 2C, right panel, but the figure caption identifies panel C as CD8+ and panel D as CD4+.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. LJMH Reed, 1938, A simple method of estimation of fifty percent end points, Am J Hyg, 27, 493

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schnee, M., Vogel, A. B., Voss, D., Petsch, B., Baumhof, P., Kramps, T., & Stitz, L.
Affiliations
  • CureVac (Germany) (DE)
  • Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Petsch, Benjamin
  • Stitz, Lothar
Venue
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Published
2016-06-23
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
e0004746
ISSN
  • 1935-2727 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-2735
OpenAlex
W2465126304
Cited by
212
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS neglected tropical diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
Funders
KMU-innovativ (031A061C, 031A061A, 0315802)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Rabies epidemiology and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
Keywords
rabies virus, rabies virus glycoprotein, mRNA vaccines, nucleic acid vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, vaccine protection, newborn pigs, intracerebral challenge, antibody persistence
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Base Sequence, Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic, Female, Glycoproteins, HeLa Cells, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Peptide Fragments, Pregnancy, Rabies, Rabies Vaccines, RNA, Messenger, Swine, Swine Diseases, T-Lymphocytes, Vaccines, Synthetic, Viral Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review