Cited by 139Mosquito-borne diseases and controlbioluminescence and chemiluminescence researchViral Infections and Vectors

Stable, High-Level Expression of Reporter Proteins from Improved Alphavirus Expression Vectors To Track Replication and Dissemination during Encephalitic and Arthritogenic Disease

Open access
Sun, Chengqun, Gardner, Christina L., Watson, Alan M., Ryman, Kate D., Klimstra, William B.·2014·Journal of Virology

Abstract

Engineered alphavirus vectors expressing reporters of infection have been used for a number of years due to their relatively low costs for analysis of virus replication and the capacity to utilize imaging systems for longitudinal measurements of growth within single animals. In general, these vectors have been derived from Old World alphaviruses using a second viral subgenomic promoter to express the transgenes, placed either immediately after the nonstructural proteins or at the 3′ end of the viral coding sequences. However, the relevance of these vectors to natural infections is questionable, as they have not been rigorously tested for virulence in vivo in comparison with parental viruses or for the retention of the reporter during replication. Here, we report construction of new expression vectors for two Old World arthritogenic alphaviruses (Sindbis and Chikungunya viruses) and two New World encephalitic alphaviruses (eastern and Venezuelan equine encephalitis viruses) based upon either fusion of the reporter protein in frame within nonstructural protein 3 (nsP3) or insertion of the reporter as a cleavable element between the capsid and PE2 structural proteins. We have compared these with a traditional 3′ double subgenomic promoter virus expressing either a large, firefly luciferase (fLuc; 1,650 nucleotides), or small, NanoLuc (nLuc; 513 nucleotides), luminescent reporter protein. Results indicate that the nLuc is substantially more stable than fLuc during repeated rounds of infection regardless of the transgene location. However, the capsid-PE2 insertion and nsP3 fusion viruses exhibit the most authentic mimicking of parental virus infection regardless of expressed protein. IMPORTANCE As more antiviral therapeutics and vaccines are developed, rapid and accurate in vivo modeling of their efficacy will be required. However, current alphavirus vectors expressing reporters of infection have not been extensively tested for accurate mimicking of the infection characteristics of unmodified parental viruses. Additionally, use of in vivo imaging systems detecting light emitted from luciferase reporters can significantly decrease costs associated with efficacy studies by minimizing numbers of animals. Herein we report development and testing of new expression vectors for Sindbis, Chikungunya, and eastern and Venezuelan equine encephalitis viruses and demonstrate that a small (∼500-nucleotide) reporter gene (NanoLuc; Promega) is very stable and causes a disease severity similar to that caused by unmodified parental viruses. In contrast, expression of larger reporters is very rapidly lost with virus replication and can be significantly attenuating. The utility of NanoLuc for in vivo imaging is also demonstrated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.02990-13

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The insertion of GFP into the chimeric SINV-VEEV virus has minimal effects on virus infection and replication.

    “The insertion of GFP has minimal effects on virus infection and replication20,24.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, C., Gardner, C. L., Watson, A. M., Ryman, K. D., & Klimstra, W. B.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
2014-02-15
Volume
88
Issue
4
Pages
2035-2046
ISSN
  • 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5514
OpenAlex
W2036090613
Cited by
139
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI083383, R01AI095436, T32AI060525)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
Keywords
reporter proteins, NanoLuc luciferase, firefly luciferase, Sindbis virus, chikungunya virus, eastern equine encephalitis virus, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, subgenomic promoter, viral replication, in vivo imaging, arthritogenic alphaviruses
MeSH terms
Alphavirus, Animals, Arthritis, Infectious, Cell Line, Genetic Engineering, Genetic Vectors, Cricetinae, Luciferases, Virus Replication, Blotting, Western, Viral Nonstructural Proteins, Genes, Reporter, Encephalitis, Viral, Transgenes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review