The Cryo-Electron Microscopy Structure of Feline Calicivirus Bound to Junctional Adhesion Molecule A at 9-Angstrom Resolution Reveals Receptor-Induced Flexibility and Two Distinct Conformational Changes in the Capsid Protein VP1
Open accessAbstract
Caliciviridae are small icosahedral positive-sense RNA-containing viruses and include the human noroviruses, a leading cause of infectious acute gastroenteritis and feline calicivirus (FCV), which causes respiratory illness and stomatitis in cats. FCV attachment and entry is mediated by feline junctional adhesion molecule A (fJAM-A), which binds to the outer face of the capsomere, inducing a conformational change in the capsid that may be important for viral uncoating. Here we present the results of our structural investigation of the virus-receptor interaction and ensuing conformational changes. Cryo-electron microscopy and three-dimensional image reconstruction were used to solve the structure of the virus decorated with a soluble fragment of the receptor at subnanometer resolution. In initial reconstructions, the P domains of the capsid protein VP1 and fJAM-A were poorly resolved. Sorting experiments led to improved reconstructions of the FCV–fJAM-A complex both before and after the induced conformational change, as well as in three transition states. These data showed that the P domain becomes flexible following fJAM-A binding, leading to a loss of icosahedral symmetry. Furthermore, two distinct conformational changes were seen; an anticlockwise rotation of up to 15° of the P domain was observed in the AB dimers, while tilting of the P domain away from the icosahedral 2-fold axis was seen in the CC dimers. A list of putative contact residues was calculated by fitting high-resolution coordinates for fJAM-A and VP1 to the reconstructed density maps, highlighting regions in both virus and receptor important for virus attachment and entry.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The distal P domain of vesivirus 2117 is morphologically distinct from that seen in other known vesivirus structures.
“showing that the distal P domain of vesivirus 2117 is morphologically distinct from that seen in other known vesivirus structures.”
From Vesivirus 2117 capsids more closely resemble sapovirus and lagovirus particles than other known vesivirus structures (2017) · cites this paper as [32]
Two molecules of feline junctional adhesion molecule-A bind to the flat surface of the FCV capsomere in a head-to-tail arrangement.
“Two molecules of feline junctional adhesion molecule-A bind to the flat surface in a head-to-tail arrangement [13, 32].”
From Vesivirus 2117 capsids more closely resemble sapovirus and lagovirus particles than other known vesivirus structures (2017) · cites this paper as [32]
The P2 domain plays a critical role in the viral infection cycle as it contains both the major immunodominant epitopes and the receptor-binding site.
“However, the P2 domain plays a critical role in the viral infection cycle as it contains both the major immunodominant epitopes and the receptor-binding site [32, 35].”
From Vesivirus 2117 capsids more closely resemble sapovirus and lagovirus particles than other known vesivirus structures (2017) · cites this paper as [32]
The outer face of the FCV capsomere incorporates the receptor-binding site.
“The outer face of the FCV capsomere incorporates the receptor-binding site.”
From Vesivirus 2117 capsids more closely resemble sapovirus and lagovirus particles than other known vesivirus structures (2017) · cites this paper as [32]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cryo-EM Structure of a Novel Calicivirus, Tulane Virus
Yu, G., Zhang, D., Guo, F., Tan, M., Jiang, X., & Jiang, W. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059817 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Conley, M., Emmott, E., Orton, R., Taylor, D., Carneiro, D. G., Murata, K., Goodfellow, I. G., Hansman, G. S., & Bhella, D. (2017) · Journal of General Virology · doi:10.1099/jgv.0.000658 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bhella, D., & Goodfellow, I. G.
- Affiliations
- MRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bhella, David
- Venue
- Journal of Virology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 11381-11390
- ISSN
- 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5514
- PMC
- PMC3194967
- OpenAlex
- W2149751513
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (081624)
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- feline calicivirus, JAM-A, virus-receptor interaction, VP1 capsid protein, conformational change, norovirus
- MeSH terms
- Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Receptors, Virus, Virion, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Calicivirus, Feline, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Capsid Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review