Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Monoclonal antibodies against simian virus 40 T antigens: evidence for distinct sublcasses of large T antigen and for similarities among nonviral T antigens

Open access
Gurney, E G, Harrison, R O, Fenno, J·1980·Journal of Virology

Abstract

We have isolated three clones of hybrid cells which synthesize antibodies specific for determinants on simian virus 40 (SV40) T antigens. Mouse myeloma NS1 cells were fused with spleen cells from mice that had been immunized with SV40-transformed mouse cells. Hybrid cells were selected in HAT medium and cloned in soft agar. We used an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection and quantification of mouse antibodies against SV40 T antigens. Monoclonal antibodies from 3 of the 24 clones that scored as positive in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were verified by immunoprecipitation to be specific for SV40 T antigens. Two clones (7 and 412) produced antibodies that recognized denaturation-sensitive antigenic determinants unique to large T antigen. Antibodies from clone 7 appeared to have a low affinity for large T antigen. Antibodies from clone 412 had a higher affinity for large T antigen but did not recognize a subclass of large T antigen that was recognized by tumor serum. Antibodies of the third clone, clone 122, recognized a denaturation-stable antigenic determinant of the 53,000-dalton mouse nonviral T antigen in SV40-transformed cells. Antibodies from clone 122 also recognized similar (51,000- to 56,000-dalton) nonviral T antigens in SV40-transormed or lytically infected cells from five mammalian species and in four uninfected mouse lines. From these observations, we have concluded that (i) the 94,000-dalton SV40 large T antigen may exist as immunologically distinguishable subclasses, and (ii) the nonviral T antigens of five mammalian species share at least one antigenic determinant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.34.3.752-763.1980

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
Gurney, E. G., Harrison, R. O., & Fenno, J.
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
1980-06
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
752-763
ISSN
  • 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5514
OpenAlex
W1874646775
Cited by
377
References
30
FWCI
19.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monoclonal antibodies against simian virus 40 T antigens: evidence for distinct sublcasses of large T antigen and for similarities among nonviral T antigens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jvi.34.3.752-763.1980
The paper
Gurney, E. G., Harrison, R. O., & Fenno, J. (1980). Monoclonal antibodies against simian virus 40 T antigens: evidence for distinct sublcasses of large T antigen and for similarities among nonviral T antigens. Journal of Virology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.34.3.752-763.1980

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.