Cited by 245Respiratory viral infections researchVirology and Viral DiseasesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Quantitative aspects of passive immunity to respiratory syncytial virus infection in infant cotton rats

Open access
Prince, G A, Horswood, R L, Chanock, R M·1985·Journal of Virology

Abstract

The amount of passively acquired serum respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-neutralizing antibodies required to protect the respiratory tract of cotton rats against infection was studied. Infant cotton rats were inoculated intraperitoneally with various dilutions of a single pool of sera derived from cotton rats convalescent from RSV infection. After 24 h, these animals were inoculated with RSV intranasally. Virus replication in the respiratory tract was suppressed in cotton rats which had a serum neutralizing antibody titer of 1:100 or greater. Resistance was greater in the lungs than in the nose. Complete or almost complete resistance in the lungs was observed in cotton rats with a serum neutralizing antibody titer of 1:380 or greater. The level of serum RSV-neutralizing antibodies required to confer significant resistance to infection in the cotton rat was similar to the level of maternally derived serum antibodies possessed by human infants less than 2 months of age, who as a group exhibit relative resistance to RSV disease compared with infants 2 to 6 months of age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.55.3.517-520.1985

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The neutralization titers elicited by LNP/RNA are above the titer of 380 that correlates with protection in cotton rats and similar to passively acquired serum neutralizing titers that correlate with protection of human infants from severe RSV disease.

    “The neutralization titers elicited by LNP/RNA are above the titer of 380 that correlates with protection in cotton rats (30) and similar to passively acquired serum neutralizing titers that correlate with protection of human infants from severe RSV disease (31,32).”

    From Nonviral delivery of self-amplifying RNA vaccines (2012) · cites this paper as [30]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 245

Authors
Prince, G. A., Horswood, R. L., & Chanock, R. M.
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
1985-09
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
517-520
ISSN
  • 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5514
OpenAlex
W2104427618
Cited by
245
References
12
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
respiratory syncytial virus, passive immunity, antibody titers, Sigmodon hispidus, infant rats, pulmonary infection, nasal infection, maternal antibodies, infant immunology, viral replication
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Viral, Immune Sera, Immunization, Passive, Lung, Neutralization Tests, Nose, Respirovirus Infections, Respiratory Syncytial Viruses, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review