Cited by 145

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Loss of p53 protein in human papillomavirus type 16 E6-immortalized human mammary epithelial cells

Band, V, De Caprio, J A, Delmolino, L, Kulesa, V, Sager, R·1991·Journal of Virology

Abstract

We have shown previously that introduction of the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) or HPV18 genome into human mammary epithelial cells induces their immortalization. These immortalized cells have reduced growth factor requirements. We report here that transfection with a single HPV16 gene E6 is sufficient to immortalize these cells and reduce their growth factor requirements. The RB protein is normal in these cells, but the p53 protein is sharply reduced, as shown by immunoprecipitation with anti-p53 antibody (pAB 421). We infer that the E6 protein reduces the p53 protein perhaps by signalling its destruction by the ubiquitin system. The HPV-transforming gene E7 was unable to immortalize human mammary epithelial cells. Thus, cell-specific factors may determine which viral oncogene plays a major role in oncogenesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.65.12.6671-6676.1991

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [3]3. Band, V., and R. Sager. 1989. Distinctive traits of normal and tumor-derived human mammary epithelial cells expressed in a medium that supports long-term growth of both cell types. Proc.
  2. [4]4. Band, V., D. Zajchowski, V. Kulesa, and R. Sager. 1990. Human papillomavirus DNAs immortalize normal epithelial cells and reduce their growth factor requirements. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:463–467.
  3. [17]17. Kaye, F. J., R. A. Kratzke, J. L. Gerster, and J. M. Horowitz. 1990. A single amino acid substitution results in a retinoblastoma protein defective in phosphorylation and oncoprotein binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:6922–6926.
  4. [26]26. O'Brien, W., G. Stenman, and R. Sager. 1986. Suppression of tun ns yl rnn m unm roman fibroblasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:8659–8663.
  5. [29]29. Schiller, J. T., W. C. Vass, and D. R. Lowy. 1984. Identification of a second transforming region in bovine papillomavirus DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:7880–7884.
  6. [31]31. Smotkin, D., and F. O. Wettstein. 1986. Transcription of human papillomavirus type 16 early genes in a cervical cancer and a cancer-derived cell line and identification of the E7 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:4680–4684.
  7. [33]33. Swisshelm, K., M. Leonard, and R. Sager. 1991. Non random chromosome loss and rearrangement in HPV-immortalized mammary epithelial cells, p. 42. In 1991 International Papillomavirus Workshop, Seattle, Wash.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Band, V, De Caprio, J. A., Delmolino, L., Kulesa, V, & Sager, R.
Affiliations
Division of Cancer Genetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
1991-12
Volume
65
Issue
12
Pages
6671-6676
ISSN
  • 0022-538X
  • 1098-5514
Cited by
145
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review