The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alteration of the pH dependence of coronavirus-induced cell fusion: effect of mutations in the spike glycoprotein
Open accessAbstract
Infection of susceptible murine cells with the coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus type 4 (MHV4) results in extensive cell-cell fusion at pHs from 5.5 to 8.5. The endosomotropic weak bases chloroquine and ammonium chloride do not prevent MHV4 infection. In marked contrast, we have selected variants from a neural cell line persistently infected with MHV4 which are entirely dependent on acid pH to fuse host cells and are strongly inhibited by endosomotropic weak bases. Wild-type and variant viruses were compared at the level of the fusion-active surface (S) glycoprotein gene. Cloning and sequencing of each 4,131-base open reading frame predicted a total of eight amino acid differences which fell into three distinct clusters. Each S glycoprotein, when expressed from cDNA, was synthesized in equivalent amounts, and similar proportions were transported to the cell surface. Wild-type S induced cell-cell fusion at neutral pH, whereas variant S required prolonged exposure to acidic pH to induce fusion. Expression of hybrid S genes prepared by exchange of restriction fragments between wild-type and variant cDNAs revealed that elimination of neutral pH fusion was solely dependent on amino acid alterations at positions 1067 (Q to H), 1094 (Q to H), and 1114 (L to R). These changes lie within a predicted heptad repeat region of the transmembrane cleavage fragment of S (S2). These findings demonstrate that the pH dependence of coronavirus fusion is highly variable and that this variability can be determined by as few as three amino acid residues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Skehel, J. J., Bayley, P. M., Brown, E. B., Martin, S. R., Waterfield, M. D., White, J. M., Wilson, I. A., & Wiley, D. C. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.4.968 · Cited by 726
Cited by
The Molecular Biology of Coronaviruses
Masters, P. S. (2006) · Advances in Virus Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-3527(06)66005-3 · Cited by 1,761
Bosch, B. J., van der Zee, R., de Haan, C. A. M., & Rottier, P. J. M. (2003) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.77.16.8801-8811.2003 · Cited by 1,489
Mechanisms of Coronavirus Cell Entry Mediated by the Viral Spike Protein
Belouzard, S., Millet, J. K., Licitra, B. N., & Whittaker, G. R. (2012) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v4061011 · Cited by 1,368
Coronavirus Pathogenesis and the Emerging Pathogen Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus
Weiss, S. R., & Navas-Martin, S. (2005) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.69.4.635-664.2005 · Cited by 1,256
Coronavirus Spike Proteins in Viral Entry and Pathogenesis
Gallagher, T. M., & Buchmeier, M. J. (2001) · Virology · doi:10.1006/viro.2000.0757 · Cited by 658
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallagher, T. M., Escarmis, C., & Buchmeier, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Virology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1916-1928
- ISSN
- 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5514
- OpenAlex
- W1860579418
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alteration of the pH dependence of coronavirus-induced cell fusion: effect of mutations in the spike glycoprotein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jvi.65.4.1916-1928.1991
- The paper
- Gallagher, T. M., Escarmis, C., & Buchmeier, M. J. (1991). Alteration of the pH dependence of coronavirus-induced cell fusion: effect of mutations in the spike glycoprotein. Journal of Virology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.65.4.1916-1928.1991
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.