Cited by 101

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein and the cellular transcription factor E2F bind to separate sites on the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein

Wu, E W, Clemens, K E, Heck, D V, Münger, K·1993·Journal of Virology

Abstract

The ability of the high-risk and low-risk human papillomavirus E7 oncoproteins to disrupt complexes of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein pRB and the cellular transcription factor E2F was studied. The ability of E7 to disrupt this transcription factor complex correlated with the different pRB binding efficiencies of the high-risk and low-risk human papillomavirus-encoded E7 proteins. The pRB binding site was the sole determinant for these observed differences. The phosphorylation status of the casein kinase II site that is immediately adjacent to the pRB binding site in E7 had no marked effect on this biochemical property of E7. Peptides consisting of the pRB binding site of E7, however, were not able to disrupt the pRB/E2F complex. These data suggest that additional carboxy-terminal sequences in E7 are also required for the efficient disruption of the pRB/E2F complex and that E7 and E2F may interact with nonidentical sites of pRB.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.67.4.2402-2407.1993

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wu, E. W., Clemens, K. E., Heck, D. V., & Münger, K.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Tumor Virus Biology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
1993-04
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
2402-2407
ISSN
  • 0022-538X
  • 1098-5514
Cited by
101
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review