The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of genomic sequences of 95 papillomavirus types: uniting typing, phylogeny, and taxonomy
Open accessAbstract
Our aim was to study the phylogenetic relationships of all known papillomaviruses (PVs) and the possibility of establishing a supratype taxonomic classification based on this information. Of the many detectably homologous segments present in PV genomes, a 291-bp segment of the L1 gene is notable because it is flanked by the MY09 and MY11 consensus primers and contains highly conserved amino acid residues which simplify sequence alignment. We determined the MY09-MY11 sequences of human PV type 20 (HPV-20), HPV-21, HPV-22, HPV-23, HPV-24, HPV-36, HPV-37, HPV-38, HPV-48, HPV-50, HPV-60, HPV-70, HPV-72, HPV-73, ovine (sheep) PV, bovine PV type 3 (BPV-3), BPV-5, and BPV-6 and created a database which now encompasses HPV-1 to HPV-70, HPV-72, HPV-73, seven yet untyped HPV genomes, and 15 animal PV types. Three additional animal PVs were analyzed on the basis of other sequence data. We constructed phylogenies based on partial L1 and E6 gene sequences and distinguished five major clades that we call supergroups. One of them unites 54 genital PV types, which can be further divided into eleven groups. The second supergroup has 24 types and unites most PVs that are typically found in epidermodysplasia verruciformis patients but also includes several types typical of other cutaneous lesions, like HPV-4. The third supergroup unites the six known ungulate fibropapillomaviruses, the fourth includes the cutaneous ungulate PVs BPV-3, BPV-4, and BPV-6, and the fifth includes HPV-1, HPV-41, HPV-63, the canine oral PV, and the cottontail rabbit PV. The chaffinch PV and two rodent PVs, Micromys minutus PV and Mastomys natalensis PV, are left ungrouped because of the relative isolation of each of their lineages. Within most supergroups, groups formed on the basis of cladistic principles unite phenotypically similar PV types. We discuss the basis of our classification, the concept of the PV type, speciation, PV-host evolution, and estimates of their rates of evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Cited by
Palefsky, J. M., Holly, E. A., Ralston, M. L., & Jay, N. (1998) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/514194 · Cited by 543
Evolution of the Papillomaviridae
Van Doorslaer, K. (2013) · Virology · doi:10.1016/j.virol.2013.05.012 · Cited by 261
Nominé, Y., Masson, M., Charbonnier, S., Zanier, K., Ristriani, T., Deryckère, F., Sibler, A.-P., Desplancq, D., Atkinson, R. A., Weiss, E., et al. (2006) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.024 · Cited by 177
Bravo, I. G., & Alonso, A. (2004) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.78.24.13613-13626.2004 · Cited by 113
Summerer, D., Hevroni, D., Jain, A., Oldenburger, O., Parker, J., Caruso, A., Stähler, C. F., Stähler, P. F., & Beier, M. (2010) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2010.03.005 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, S. Y., Delius, H., Halpern, A. L., & Bernard, H. U.
- Venue
- Journal of Virology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3074-3083
- ISSN
- 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5514
- OpenAlex
- W2140059211
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of genomic sequences of 95 papillomavirus types: uniting typing, phylogeny, and taxonomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jvi.69.5.3074-3083.1995
- The paper
- Chan, S. Y., Delius, H., Halpern, A. L., & Bernard, H. U. (1995). Analysis of genomic sequences of 95 papillomavirus types: uniting typing, phylogeny, and taxonomy. Journal of Virology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.69.5.3074-3083.1995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.