Cited by 68T-cell and Retrovirus StudiesRNA Research and SplicingHIV Research and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

cis-active structural motifs involved in specific encapsidation of Moloney murine leukemia virus RNA

Open access
Mougel, M, Zhang, Y, Barklis, E·1996·Journal of Virology

Abstract

We have analyzed the roles of RNA structural motifs located in the 5' part of the Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MuLV) encapsidation domain (Psi region) with regard to their effects on viral replication. Four putative stem-loop structures between the 5' splice donor site and the gag initiation codon have been examined: stem structure A, corresponding to M-MuLV viral nucleotides 211 to 224; stem-loop B, nucleotides 278 to 303; stem-loop C, nucleotides 310 to 352; and stem-loop D, nucleotides 355 to 374. By measuring infectivities, encapsidation and splicing efficiencies, and endogenous reverse transcription levels of motif A, B, C, and D deletion mutants, we identified mutations which affect replication at the encapsidation step. In particular, deletion of all four motifs in a single mutant eliminated encapsidation of viral RNA, while deletion of individual elements moderately reduced the encapsidation efficiencies. Through analysis of different deletion combinations, we found that deletion of the first two motifs (A plus B) reduced both encapsidation and reverse transcription efficiencies, while deletion of the 3' motifs (C plus D) eliminated encapsidation. Interestingly, the C and D motifs both contain a GACG loop sequence and are highly conserved among murine type C retroviruses. Our results indicate that M-MuLV motifs C and D are necessary for efficient encapsidation, and the presence of at least one of these two stem-loops is crucial to encapsidation and virus replication.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.70.8.5043-5050.1996

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mougel, M., Zhang, Y., & Barklis, E.
Affiliations
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
1996-08
Volume
70
Issue
8
Pages
5043-5050
ISSN
  • 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5514
OpenAlex
W1512553008
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01gm052914-07)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1R01 GM52914-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
Keywords
Moloney murine leukemia virus, RNA encapsidation, stem-loop structure, viral RNA splicing, reverse transcription, viral replication, type C retroviruses
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Leukemia Virus, Murine, RNA Splicing, RNA, Viral, Virus Replication, Point Mutation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review