The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Low Levels of β-Lactam Antibiotics Induce Extracellular DNA Release and Biofilm Formation in Staphylococcus aureus
Open accessAbstract
Subminimal inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics have been shown to induce bacterial biofilm formation. Few studies have investigated antibiotic-induced biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus , an important human pathogen. Our goal was to measure S. aureus biofilm formation in the presence of low levels of β-lactam antibiotics. Fifteen phylogenetically diverse methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) strains were employed. Methicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, and cloxacillin were added to cultures at concentrations ranging from 0× to 1× MIC. Biofilm formation was measured in 96-well microtiter plates using a crystal violet binding assay. Autoaggregation was measured using a visual test tube settling assay. Extracellular DNA was quantitated using agarose gel electrophoresis. All four antibiotics induced biofilm formation in some strains. The amount of biofilm induction was as high as 10-fold and was inversely proportional to the amount of biofilm produced by the strain in the absence of antibiotics. MRSA strains of lineages USA300, USA400, and USA500 exhibited the highest levels of methicillin-induced biofilm induction. Biofilm formation induced by low-level methicillin was inhibited by DNase. Low-level methicillin also induced DNase-sensitive autoaggregation and extracellular DNA release. The biofilm induction phenotype was absent in a strain deficient in autolysin ( atl ). Our findings demonstrate that subminimal inhibitory concentrations of β-lactam antibiotics significantly induce autolysin-dependent extracellular DNA release and biofilm formation in some strains of S. aureus . IMPORTANCE The widespread use of antibiotics as growth promoters in agriculture may expose bacteria to low levels of the drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of low levels of antibiotics on bacterial autoaggregation and biofilm formation, two processes that have been shown to foster genetic exchange and antibiotic resistance. We found that low levels of β-lactam antibiotics, a class commonly used in both clinical and agricultural settings, caused significant autoaggregation and biofilm formation by the important human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus . Both processes were dependent on cell lysis and release of DNA into the environment. The effect was most pronounced among multidrug-resistant strains known as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). These results may shed light on the recalcitrance of some bacterial infections to antibiotic treatment in clinical settings and the evolution of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in agricultural settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cell aggregation of S. aureus can be a result of antibiotic treatment.
“As in the case of P. aeruginosa, cell aggregation of S. aureus confers a tolerance to various antibiotics [11] and can even be a result of antibiotic treatment in the first place [136].”
From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [136]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01572.x · DOI
- 10.4161/viru.2.5.17724 · DOI
- 10.1002/jobm.201000221 · DOI
- 10.1093/jac/dkr043 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04529.x · DOI
- 10.1128/AAC.01052-06 · DOI
- 10.5301/ijao.5000027 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01989980 · DOI
- 10.1128/AAC.37.4.921 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0924-8579(00)00243-0 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.082188899 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.02073-07 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ja.2011.113 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002626 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-007-0940-9_7 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0005822 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0610226104 · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.00364-10 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000052 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0026714 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.resmic.2011.03.008 · DOI
- 10.1093/jac/33.4.845 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01719-3 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0003361 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030102 · DOI
- 10.1128/AAC.41.5.906 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.01222-08 · DOI
- 10.1093/jac/dkq257 · DOI
- 10.1128/CMR.00002-11 · DOI · Paper page
- BoseJL LehmanMK FeyPD BaylesKW . Contribution of the Staphylococcus aureus AtlA AM and GL murein hydrolase activities in cell division, autolysis, and biofilm formation. PLoS One, in press.
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0010146 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08713-5 · DOI
- DuthieES LorenzLL . 1952. Staphylococcal coagulase; mode of action and antigenicity. J. Gen. Microbiol. 6:95–107.
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68231-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04403-2 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0402521101 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.187.7.2426-2438.2005 · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.70.7.3978-3981.2002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.07.015 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.184.19.5457-5467.2002 · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.73.8.4596-4606.2005 · DOI
- 10.1128/iai.49.3.765-769.1985 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trunk, T., Bacterial Cell Surface Group, S. F. G. A. E. B., S. Khalil, H., & C. Leo, J. (2018) · AIMS Microbiology · doi:10.3934/microbiol.2018.1.140 · Cited by 444
“aureus confers a tolerance to various antibiotics [11] and can even be a result of antibiotic treatment in the first place [136].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplan, J. B., Izano, E. A., Gopal, P., Karwacki, M. T., Kim, S., Bose, J. L., Bayles, K. W., & Horswill, A. R.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
- University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Venue
- mBio
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2012-08-31
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e00198-12
- ISSN
- 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-2129
- PMC
- PMC3419523
- OpenAlex
- W2153773689
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalCommons@UNMC (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R21AI082392, AI83211, P01AI083211, AI82392, R01AI038901, R29AI038901, AI038901)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
- Keywords
- Staphylococcus aureus, beta-lactam antibiotics, biofilm formation, extracellular DNA release, methicillin, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, self-aggregation, autolysin, DNase, antibiotic growth promoters, multidrug resistance, USA300
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, DNA, Bacterial, Extracellular Space, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Biofilms, beta-Lactams, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review