The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Double-Stranded DNA Virosphere as a Modular Hierarchical Network of Gene Sharing
Open accessAbstract
Virus genomes are prone to extensive gene loss, gain, and exchange and share no universal genes. Therefore, in a broad-scale study of virus evolution, gene and genome network analyses can complement traditional phylogenetics. We performed an exhaustive comparative analysis of the genomes of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) viruses by using the bipartite network approach and found a robust hierarchical modularity in the dsDNA virosphere. Bipartite networks consist of two classes of nodes, with nodes in one class, in this case genomes, being connected via nodes of the second class, in this case genes. Such a network can be partitioned into modules that combine nodes from both classes. The bipartite network of dsDNA viruses includes 19 modules that form 5 major and 3 minor supermodules. Of these modules, 11 include tailed bacteriophages, reflecting the diversity of this largest group of viruses. The module analysis quantitatively validates and refines previously proposed nontrivial evolutionary relationships. An expansive supermodule combines the large and giant viruses of the putative order “Megavirales” with diverse moderate-sized viruses and related mobile elements. All viruses in this supermodule share a distinct morphogenetic tool kit with a double jelly roll major capsid protein. Herpesviruses and tailed bacteriophages comprise another supermodule, held together by a distinct set of morphogenetic proteins centered on the HK97-like major capsid protein. Together, these two supermodules cover the great majority of currently known dsDNA viruses. We formally identify a set of 14 viral hallmark genes that comprise the hubs of the network and account for most of the intermodule connections. IMPORTANCE Viruses and related mobile genetic elements are the dominant biological entities on earth, but their evolution is not sufficiently understood and their classification is not adequately developed. The key reason is the characteristic high rate of virus evolution that involves not only sequence change but also extensive gene loss, gain, and exchange. Therefore, in the study of virus evolution on a large scale, traditional phylogenetic approaches have limited applicability and have to be complemented by gene and genome network analyses. We applied state-of-the art methods of such analysis to reveal robust hierarchical modularity in the genomes of double-stranded DNA viruses. Some of the identified modules combine highly diverse viruses infecting bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, in support of previous hypotheses on direct evolutionary relationships between viruses from the three domains of cellular life. We formally identify a set of 14 viral hallmark genes that hold together the genomic network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Fortunato, S. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002 · Cited by 11,293
Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization
Barabási, A.-L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1272 · Cited by 7,903
Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes
Spang, A., Saw, J. H., Jørgensen, S. L., Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka, K., Martijn, J., Lind, A. E., van Eijk, R., Schleper, C., Guy, L., & Ettema, T. J. G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14447 · Cited by 1,324
Evolutionary Rate in the Protein Interaction Network
Fraser, H. B., Hirsh, A. E., Steinmetz, L. M., Scharfe, C., & Feldman, M. W. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1068696 · Cited by 869
Group selection of early replicators and the origin of life
Szathmáry, E., & Demeter, L. (1987) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80191-1 · Cited by 407
Cited by
Evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants
Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I., Iranzo, J., Shmakov, S. A., Alkhnbashi, O. S., Brouns, S. J. J., Charpentier, E., Cheng, D., Haft, D. H., Horvath, P., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0299-x · Cited by 2,445
Self-citationPhage diversity, genomics and phylogeny
Dion, M. B., Oechslin, F., & Moineau, S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0311-5 · Cited by 960
Global Organization and Proposed Megataxonomy of the Virus World
Koonin, E. V., Dolja, V. V., Krupovic, M., Varsani, A., Wolf, Y. I., Yutin, N., Zerbini, F. M., & Kuhn, J. H. (2020) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00061-19 · Cited by 585
Self-citationOrigins and Evolution of the Global RNA Virome
Wolf, Y. I., Kazlauskas, D., Iranzo, J., Lucía-Sanz, A., Kuhn, J. H., Krupovic, M., Dolja, V. V., & Koonin, E. V. (2018) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02329-18 · Cited by 508
Self-citationContemporary Phage Biology: From Classic Models to New Insights
Ofir, G., & Sorek, R. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.045 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Iranzo, J., Krupovic, M., & Koonin, E. V.
- Venue
- mBio
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2016-09-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-2129
- OpenAlex
- W2499248285
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 23.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Double-Stranded DNA Virosphere as a Modular Hierarchical Network of Gene Sharing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mbio.00978-16
- The paper
- Iranzo, J., Krupovic, M., & Koonin, E. V. (2016). The Double-Stranded DNA Virosphere as a Modular Hierarchical Network of Gene Sharing. mBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00978-16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.