Gds1 Interacts with NuA4 To Promote H4 Acetylation at Ribosomal Protein Genes
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract In our previously published studies, RNA polymerase II transcription initiation complexes were assembled from yeast nuclear extracts onto immobilized transcription templates and analyzed by quantitative mass spectrometry. In addition to the expected basal factors and coactivators, we discovered that the uncharacterized protein Gds1 showed activator-stimulated association with promoter DNA. Gds1 co-precipitated with the histone H4 acetyltransferase NuA4, and its levels often tracked with NuA4 in immobilized template experiments. GDS1 deletion led to reduction in H4 acetylation in vivo and other phenotypes consistent with partial loss of NuA4 activity. Genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation revealed that the reduction in H4 acetylation was strongest at ribosomal protein gene promoters and other genes with high NuA4 occupancy. Therefore, while Gds1 is not a stoichiometric subunit of NuA4, we propose that it interacts with and modulates NuA4 in specific promoter contexts. Gds1 has no obvious metazoan homolog, but structural predictions suggest it may be distantly related to the DEK protein.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
In vitro analysis of RNA polymerase II elongation complex dynamics
Joo, Y. J., Ficarro, S. B., Chun, Y., Marto, J. A., & Buratowski, S. (2019) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.324202.119 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Joo, Y. J., & Buratowski, S.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Buratowski, Stephen
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-01-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e0037321-e0037321
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- PMC
- PMC8773082
- OpenAlex
- W3209089365
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular and Cellular Biology (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM046498)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
- Keywords
- histone H4 acetylation, ribosomal protein genes, transcriptional coactivator, histone acetyltransferase, promoter binding, RNA polymerase II transcription initiation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, chromatin immunoprecipitation
- MeSH terms
- Acetylation, DNA-Binding Proteins, Histones, Nucleosomes, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Ribosomal Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription, Genetic, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Histone Acetyltransferases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review