53BP1, BRCA1, and the Choice between Recombination and End Joining at DNA Double-Strand Breaks
Open accessAbstract
When DNA double-strand breaks occur, the cell cycle stage has a major influence on the choice of the repair pathway employed. Specifically, nonhomologous end joining is the predominant mechanism used in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, while homologous recombination becomes fully activated in S phase. Studies over the past 2 decades have revealed that the aberrant joining of replication-associated breaks leads to catastrophic genome rearrangements, revealing an important role of DNA break repair pathway choice in the preservation of genome integrity. 53BP1, first identified as a DNA damage checkpoint protein, and BRCA1, a well-known breast cancer tumor suppressor, are at the center of this choice. Research on how these proteins function at the DNA break site has advanced rapidly in the recent past. Here, we review what is known regarding how the repair pathway choice is made, including the mechanisms that govern the recruitment of each critical factor, and how the cell transitions from end joining in G1 to homologous recombination in S/G2.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The complex aids resection of DNA ends, producing a single-stranded template that recruits BRCA2-PALB2 and RAD51.
“BRCA1-BARD1 facilitates the nucleolytic resection of DNA ends to generate a single-stranded template for the recruitment of another tumor suppressor complex BRCA2-PALB2 and the recombinase RAD51.”
From BRCA1–BARD1 promotes RAD51-mediated homologous DNA pairing (2017) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 103 · Cited by 318
- Authors
- Daley, J. M., & Sung, P.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1380-1388
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- PMC
- PMC3993578
- OpenAlex
- W2114404734
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Molecular and Cellular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES015252, R01ES015632)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Keywords
- 53BP1, BRCA1, DNA double-strand breaks, non-homologous end joining, homologous recombination, DNA repair pathway choice, G1 phase, S phase, genome rearrangement, DNA damage checkpoint
- MeSH terms
- Tumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1, Animals, Cell Cycle, Humans, Recombination, Genetic, BRCA1 Protein, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, DNA End-Joining Repair
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review