The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tumor suppressor p53: analysis of wild-type and mutant p53 complexes.
Open accessAbstract
It has been suggested that the dominant effect of mutant p53 on tumor progression may reflect the mutant protein binding to wild-type p53, with inactivation of suppressor function. To date, evidence for wild-type/mutant p53 complexes involves p53 from different species. To investigate wild-type/mutant p53 complexes in relation to natural tumor progression, we sought to identify intraspecific complexes, using murine p53. The mutant phenotype p53-246(0) was used because this phenotype is immunologically distinct from wild-type p53-246+ and thus permits immunological analysis for wild-type/mutant p53 complexes. The p53 proteins were derived from genetically defined p53 cDNAs expressed in vitro and also from phenotypic variants of p53 expressed in vivo. We found that the mutant p53 phenotype was able to form a complex with the wild type when the two p53 variants were cotranslated. When mixed in their native states (after translation), the wild-type and mutant p53 proteins did not exhibit any binding affinity for each other in vitro. Under identical conditions, complexes of wild-type human and murine p53 proteins were formed. For murine p53, both the wild-type and mutant p53 proteins formed high-molecular-weight complexes when translated in vitro. This oligomerization appeared to involve the carboxyl terminus, since truncated p53 (amino acids 1 to 343) did not form complexes. We suggest that the ability of the mutant p53 phenotype to complex with wild type during cotranslation may contribute to the transforming function of activated mutants of p53 in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The p53 proto-oncogene can act as a suppressor of transformation
Finlay, C. A., Hinds, P. W., & Levine, A. J. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90045-7 · Cited by 1,987
Cited by
Weinberg, R. A. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1659741 · Cited by 1,756
When mutants gain new powers: News from the mutant p53 field
Brosh, R., & Rotter, V. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2693 · Cited by 1,132
Gain of function of a p53 hot spot mutation in a mouse model of Li-Fraumeni syndrome
Lang, G. A., Iwakuma, T., Suh, Y.-A., Liu, G., Rao, V. A., Parant, J. M., Valentin-Vega, Y. A., Terzian, T., Caldwell, L. C., Strong, L. C., et al. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.006 · Cited by 1,069
Rivlin, N., Brosh, R., Oren, M., & Rotter, V. (2011) · Genes & Cancer · doi:10.1177/1947601911408889 · Cited by 1,033
Awakening guardian angels: drugging the p53 pathway
Brown, C. J., Lain, S., Verma, C. S., Fersht, A. R., & Lane, D. P. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2763 · Cited by 881
Metadata
- Authors
- Milner, J., Medcalf, E. A., & Cook, A. C.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12-19
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- OpenAlex
- W1839476071
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumor suppressor p53: analysis of wild-type and mutant p53 complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.11.1.12
- The paper
- Milner, J., Medcalf, E. A., & Cook, A. C. (1991). Tumor suppressor p53: analysis of wild-type and mutant p53 complexes. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.11.1.12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.