The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Suppression of ribosomal reinitiation at upstream open reading frames in amino acid-starved cells forms the basis for GCN4 translational control.
Open accessAbstract
GCN4 encodes a transcriptional activator of amino acid-biosynthetic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that is regulated at the translational level by upstream open reading frames (uORFs) in its mRNA leader. uORF4 (counting from the 5' end) is sufficient to repress GCN4 under nonstarvation conditions; uORF1 is required to overcome the inhibitory effect of uORF4 and stimulate GCN4 translation in amino acid-starved cells. Insertions of sequences with the potential to form secondary structure around uORF4 abolish derepression, indicating that ribosomes reach GCN4 by traversing uORF4 sequences rather than by binding internally to the GCN4 start site. By showing that wild-type regulation occurred even when uORF4 was elongated to overlap GCN4 by 130 nucleotides, we provide strong evidence that those ribosomes which translate GCN4 do so by ignoring the uORF4 AUG start codon. This conclusion is in accord with the fact that translation of a uORF4-lacZ fusion was lower in a derepressed gcd1 mutant than in a nonderepressible gcn2 strain. We also show that increasing the distance between uORF1 and uORF4 to the wild-type spacing that separates uORF1 from GCN4 specifically impaired the ability of uORF1 to derepress GCN4 translation. As expected, this alteration led to increased uORF4-lacZ translation in gcd1 cells. Our results suggest that under starvation conditions, a substantial fraction of ribosomes that translate uORF1 fail to reassemble the factors needed for reinitiation by the time they scan to uORF4, but become competent to reinitiate after scanning the additional sequences to GCN4. Under nonstarvation conditions, ribosomes would recover more rapidly from uORF1 translation, causing them all to reinitiate at uORF4 rather than at GCN4.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., & Arnheim, N. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999980 · Cited by 8,956
Cited by
Reinitiation involving upstream ORFs regulates ATF4 mRNA translation in mammalian cells
Vattem, K. M., & Wek, R. C. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0400541101 · Cited by 1,696
Lu, P. D., Harding, H. P., & Ron, D. (2004) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200408003 · Cited by 1,006
Dever, T. E., Feng, L., Wek, R. C., Cigan, A. M., Donahue, T. F., & Hinnebusch, A. G. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90193-g · Cited by 776
Self-citationShi, Y., Vattem, K. M., Sood, R., An, J., Liang, J., Stramm, L., & Wek, R. C. (1998) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.18.12.7499 · Cited by 774
Translational Regulation of Yeast GCN4
Hinnebusch, A. G. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.35.21661 · Cited by 522
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Abastado, J. P., Miller, P. F., Jackson, B. M., & Hinnebusch, A. G.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 486-496
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- OpenAlex
- W1899601083
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Suppression of ribosomal reinitiation at upstream open reading frames in amino acid-starved cells forms the basis for GCN4 translational control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.11.1.486
- The paper
- Abastado, J. P., Miller, P. F., Jackson, B. M., & Hinnebusch, A. G. (1991). Suppression of ribosomal reinitiation at upstream open reading frames in amino acid-starved cells forms the basis for GCN4 translational control. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.11.1.486
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.