The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen-dependent abasic site repair in Xenopus laevis oocytes: an alternative pathway of base excision DNA repair.
Open accessAbstract
DNA damage frequently leads to the production of apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites, which are presumed to be repaired through the base excision pathway. For detailed analyses of this repair mechanism, a synthetic analog of an AP site, 3-hydroxy-2-hydroxymethyltetrahydrofuran (tetrahydrofuran), has been employed in a model system. Tetrahydrofuran residues are efficiently repaired in a Xenopus laevis oocyte extract in which most repair events involve ATP-dependent incorporation of no more than four nucleotides (Y. Matsumoto and D. F. Bogenhagen, Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:3750-3757, 1989; Y. Matsumoto and D. F. Bogenhagen, Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:4441-4447, 1991). Using a series of column chromatography procedures to fractionate X. laevis ovarian extracts, we developed a reconstituted system of tetrahydrofuran repair with five fractions, three of which were purified to near homogeneity: proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), AP endonuclease, and DNA polymerase delta. This PCNA-dependent system repaired natural AP sites as well as tetrahydrofuran residues. DNA polymerase beta was able to replace DNA polymerase delta only for repair of natural AP sites in a reaction that did not require PCNA. DNA polymerase alpha did not support repair of either type of AP site. This result indicates that AP sites can be repaired by two distinct pathways, the PCNA-dependent pathway and the DNA polymerase beta-dependent pathway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Klungland, A. (1997) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/16.11.3341 · Cited by 788
Excision of Deoxyribose Phosphate Residues by DNA Polymerase β During DNA Repair
Matsumoto, Y., & Kim, K. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7624801 · Cited by 683
Self-citationMammalian Base Excision Repair: the Forgotten Archangel
Dianov, G. L., & Hübscher, U. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt076 · Cited by 363
Post-replicative base excision repair in replication foci
Otterlei, M. (1999) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/18.13.3834 · Cited by 339
FORTINI, P., & DOGLIOTTI, E. (2007) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.10.008 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Matsumoto, Y., Kim, K., & Bogenhagen, D. F.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 6187-6197
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- OpenAlex
- W2154690470
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen-dependent abasic site repair in Xenopus laevis oocytes: an alternative pathway of base excision DNA repair. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.14.9.6187
- The paper
- Matsumoto, Y., Kim, K., & Bogenhagen, D. F. (1994). Proliferating cell nuclear antigen-dependent abasic site repair in Xenopus laevis oocytes: an alternative pathway of base excision DNA repair. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.14.9.6187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.