Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential Activation of Target Cellular Promoters by p53 Mutants with Impaired Apoptotic Function

Open access
Ludwig, Robert L., Bates, Stewart, Vousden, Karen H.·1996·Molecular and Cellular Biology

Abstract

The p53 tumor suppressor protein is a sequence-specific transcriptional activator, a function which contributes to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induced by p53 in appropriate cell types. Analysis of a series of p53 point mutants has revealed the potential for selective loss of the ability to transactivate some, but not all, cellular p53-responsive promoters. p53 175P and p53 181L are tumor-derived p53 point mutants which were previously characterized as transcriptionally active. Both mutants retained the ability to activate expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p2lcip1/waf1, and this activity correlated with the ability to induce a G1 cell cycle arrest. However, an extension of this survey to include other p53 targets showed that p53 175P was defective in the activation of p53-responsive sequences derived from the bax promoter and the insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 gene (IGF-BP3) promoter, while p53 181L showed loss of the ability to activate a promoter containing IGF-BP3 box B sequences. Failure to activate transcription was also reflected in the reduced ability of the mutants to bind the p53-responsive DNA sequences present in these promoters. These specific defects in transcriptional activation correlated with the impaired apoptotic function displayed by these mutants, and the results suggest that activation of cell cycle arrest genes by p53 can be separated from activation of genes with a role in mediating the p53 apoptotic response. The cellular response to p53 activation may therefore depend, at least in part, on which group of p53-responsive genes become transcriptionally activated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mcb.16.9.4952

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Ludwig, R. L., Bates, S., & Vousden, K. H.
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Biology
Published
1996-09-01
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
4952-4960
ISSN
  • 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5549
OpenAlex
W1863595524
Cited by
275
References
56
FWCI
9.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Activation of Target Cellular Promoters by p53 Mutants with Impaired Apoptotic Function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.16.9.4952
The paper
Ludwig, R. L., Bates, S., & Vousden, K. H. (1996). Differential Activation of Target Cellular Promoters by p53 Mutants with Impaired Apoptotic Function. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.16.9.4952

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.