The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recognition and Repair of Compound DNA Lesions (Base Damage and Mismatch) by Human Mismatch Repair and Excision Repair Systems
Open accessAbstract
Nucleotide excision repair and the long-patch mismatch repair systems correct abnormal DNA structures arising from DNA damage and replication errors, respectively. DNA synthesis past a damaged base (translesion replication) often causes misincorporation at the lesion site. In addition, mismatches are hot spots for DNA damage because of increased susceptibility of unpaired bases to chemical modification. We call such a DNA lesion, that is, a base damage superimposed on a mismatch, a compound lesion. To learn about the processing of compound lesions by human cells, synthetic compound lesions containing UV photoproducts or cisplatin 1,2-d(GpG) intrastrand cross-link and mismatch were tested for binding to the human mismatch recognition complex hMutS alpha and for excision by the human excision nuclease. No functional overlap between excision repair and mismatch repair was observed. The presence of a thymine dimer or a cisplatin diadduct in the context of a G-T mismatch reduced the affinity of hMutS alpha for the mismatch. In contrast, the damaged bases in these compound lesions were excised three- to fourfold faster than simple lesions by the human excision nuclease, regardless of the presence of hMutS alpha in the reaction. These results provide a new perspective on how excision repair, a cellular defense system for maintaining genomic integrity, can fix mutations under certain circumstances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sancar, A. (1996) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.000355 · Cited by 1,131
Self-citationReconstitution of Human DNA Repair Excision Nuclease in a Highly Defined System
Mu, D., Park, C.-H., Matsunaga, T., Hsu, D. S., Reardon, J. T., & Sancar, A. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.6.2415 · Cited by 476
Self-citationKim, J., Patel, D., & Choi, B. (1995) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1995.tb05236.x · Cited by 240
Cited by
Oxidative Stress in Aging Human Skin
Rinnerthaler, M., Bischof, J., Streubel, M., Trost, A., & Richter, K. (2015) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom5020545 · Cited by 1,053
Buermeyer, A. B., Deschênes, S. M., Baker, S. M., & Liskay, R. M. (1999) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.533 · Cited by 451
A multistep damage recognition mechanism for global genomic nucleotide excision repair
Sugasawa, K., Okamoto, T., Shimizu, Y., Masutani, C., Iwai, S., & Hanaoka, F. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.866301 · Cited by 435
Mismatch repair and DNA damage signalling
Stojic, L., Brun, R., & Jiricny, J. (2004) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.06.006 · Cited by 396
Recognition and processing of cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-DNA adducts
Chaney, S. G., Campbell, S. L., Bassett, E., & Wu, Y. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.08.008 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Mu, D., Tursun, M., Duckett, D. R., Drummond, J. T., Modrich, P., & Sancar, A.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 760-769
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- OpenAlex
- W2098489063
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recognition and Repair of Compound DNA Lesions (Base Damage and Mismatch) by Human Mismatch Repair and Excision Repair Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.17.2.760
- The paper
- Mu, D., Tursun, M., Duckett, D. R., Drummond, J. T., Modrich, P., & Sancar, A. (1997). Recognition and Repair of Compound DNA Lesions (Base Damage and Mismatch) by Human Mismatch Repair and Excision Repair Systems. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.17.2.760
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.