The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.
DNA Repair Protein Rad55 Is a Terminal Substrate of the DNA Damage Checkpoints
Open accessAbstract
Checkpoints, which are integral to the cellular response to DNA damage, coordinate transient cell cycle arrest and the induced expression of DNA repair genes after genotoxic stress. DNA repair ensures cellular survival and genomic stability, utilizing a multipathway network. Here we report evidence that the two systems, DNA damage checkpoint control and DNA repair, are directly connected by demonstrating that the Rad55 double-strand break repair protein of the recombinational repair pathway is a terminal substrate of DNA damage and replication block checkpoints. Rad55p was specifically phosphorylated in response to DNA damage induced by the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate, dependent on an active DNA damage checkpoint. Rad55p modification was also observed after gamma ray and UV radiation. The rapid time course of phosphorylation and the recombination defects identified in checkpoint-deficient cells are consistent with a role of the DNA damage checkpoint in activating recombinational repair. Rad55p phosphorylation possibly affects the balance between different competing DNA repair pathways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The checkpoints also actively stimulate the repair processes [1–9] and, in higher eukaryotes, trigger the apoptotic response, if damage cannot be dealt with successfully [10–12].”
From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [3]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Friedberg, E. C., Walker, G. C., Siede, W., Wood, R. D., Schultz, R. A., & Ellenberger, T. (2005) · doi:10.1128/9781555816704 · Cited by 5,683
Checkpoints: Controls That Ensure the Order of Cell Cycle Events
Hartwell, L. H., & Weinert, T. A. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2683079 · Cited by 3,053
New heterologous modules for classical or PCR‐based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Wach, A., Brachat, A., Pöhlmann, R., & Philippsen, P. (1994) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.320101310 · Cited by 2,532
Bootsma, D., & Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (1996) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/0168-9525(96)81408-9 · Cited by 2,285
Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Pâques, F., & Haber, J. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999 · Cited by 2,120
Cell Cycle Checkpoints: Preventing an Identity Crisis
Elledge, S. J. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5293.1664 · Cited by 2,050
Keeney, S., Giroux, C. N., & Kleckner, N. E. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81876-0 · Cited by 1,824
Genetic Control of the Cell Division Cycle in Yeast
Hartwell, L. H., Culotti, J. G., Pringle, J. R., & Reid, B. J. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.183.4120.46 · Cited by 1,567
Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli
Kowalczykowski, S. C., Dixon, D. A., Eggleston, A. K., Lauder, S., & Rehrauer, W. M. (1994) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.58.3.401-465.1994 · Cited by 1,255
The RAD9 Gene Controls the Cell Cycle Response to DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Weinert, T. A., & Hartwell, L. H. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3291120 · Cited by 1,171
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–164 of 164
Pike, B. L., Tenis, N., & Heierhorst, J. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m405080200 · Cited by 17
Heyer, W., & Kanaar, R. (2004) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.025 · Cited by 17
Self-citationDurdíková, K., & Chovanec, M. (2016) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00294-016-0670-7 · Cited by 16
The Role of the Rad55–Rad57 Complex in DNA Repair
Roy, U., & Greene, E. C. (2021) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes12091390 · Cited by 17
Regulation of NEIL1 protein abundance by RAD9 is important for efficient base excision repair
Panigrahi, S. K., Hopkins, K. M., & Lieberman, H. B. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv327 · Cited by 16
Fasullo, M., Dong, Z., Sun, M., & Zeng, L. (2005) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.06.006 · Cited by 16
Fasullo, M., & Sun, M. (2008) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.09.009 · Cited by 15
Post-translational modification of factors involved in homologous recombination
Argunhan, B., Iwasaki, H., & Tsubouchi, H. (2021) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103114 · Cited by 15
Zhang, H., & Siede, W. (2003) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s0027-5107(03)00074-5 · Cited by 13
Osman, F., Tsaneva, I. R., Whitby, M. C., & Doe, C. L. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/160.3.891 · Cited by 12
Doerfler, L., Harris, L., Viebranz, E., & Schmidt, K. H. (2011) · Genome Integrity · doi:10.1186/2041-9414-2-8 · Cited by 10
Hofmann, A. F., & Harris, S. D. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/159.4.1595 · Cited by 11
Sun, M., & Fasullo, M. (2007) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.6.15.4510 · Cited by 9
Nyberg, K. A., Michelson, R. J., Putnam, C. W., & Weinert, T. A. (2002) · Cited by 10
Dual functions of Mdt1 in genome maintenance and cell integrity pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Traven, A., Lo, T. L., Pike, B. L., Friesen, H., Guzzo, J., Andrews, B., & Heierhorst, J. (2009) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.1730 · Cited by 9
Drug-Sensitive DNA Polymerase δ Reveals a Role for Mismatch Repair in Checkpoint Activation in Yeast
Reha-Krantz, L. J., Siddique, M. S. P., Murphy, K. M., Tam, A. J. C., O’Carroll, M., Lou, S., Schultz, A., & Boone, C. M. (2011) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.111.131938 · Cited by 8
The role of the DNA damage checkpoint in regulation of translesion DNA synthesis
Koren, A. (2007) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gem003 · Cited by 8
Induction of mitotic crossing-over in diploid strains of Aspergillus nidulans using low-dose X-rays
Stoll, L. B., Cremonesi, F. C. A., Pires, L. T. A., Zucchi, T. D., & Zucchi, T. M. A. D. (2008) · Genetics and Molecular Research · doi:10.4238/vol7-2gmr414 · Cited by 8
Multi-step control of homologous recombination via Mec1/ATR suppresses chromosomal rearrangements
Xie, B., Sanford, E. J., Hung, S.-H., Wagner, M. M., Heyer, W., & Smolka, M. B. (2024) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/s44318-024-00139-9 · Cited by 9
Self-citationNunes, E., Candreva, E. C., Bracesco, N., Sánchez, A. G., & Dell, M. (2008) · Journal of Biological Physics · doi:10.1007/s10867-008-9105-0 · Cited by 6
Salakhova, A. F., Savchenko, G. V., Khasanov, F. K., CHEPURNAYA, O. V., Королев, В. Г., & Bashkirov, V. I. (2005) · Russian Journal of Genetics · doi:10.1007/s11177-005-0132-7 · Cited by 7
Self-citationFacing Stalled Replication Forks: The Intricacies of Doing the Right Thing
Rudolph, C. J., Schürer, K. A., & Kramer, W. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/7050_003 · Cited by 7
Rad51 determines pathway usage in post-replication repair
Meyer, D. H., Gore, S. K., Liu, J., Ceballos, S. J., Hung, S.-H., Reginato, G., Cano-Linares, M. I., Masłowska, K. H., Villafañez, F., Fasching, C. L., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-68109-1 · Cited by 6
Self-citationAccumulation of sumoylated Rad52 in checkpoint mutants perturbed in DNA replication
Ohuchi, T., Seki, M., Kugou, K., Tada, S., Ohta, K., & Enomoto, T. (2009) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.01.018 · Cited by 5
Bracesco, N., Candreva, E. C., Keszenman, D. J., Sánchez, A. G., Soria, S., Dell, M., Siede, W., & Nunes, E. (2007) · Radiation and Environmental Biophysics · doi:10.1007/s00411-007-0119-y · Cited by 6
Recombinational Repair in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: A Role in Maintaining Genome Integrity
Khasanov, F. K., & Bashkirov, V. I. (2001) · Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1012357800484 · Cited by 6
Self-citationRole of the Srs2–Rad51 Interaction Domain in Crossover Control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Jenkins, S. S., Gore, S. K., Guo, X., Liu, J., Ede, C., Veaute, X., Jinks-Robertson, S., Kowalczykowski, S. C., & Heyer, W. (2019) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.119.302337 · Cited by 6
Self-citationPhosphoregulation of DNA repair via the Rad51 auxiliary factor Swi5–Sfr1
Liang, P., Lister, K., Yates, L. A., Argunhan, B., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104929 · Cited by 4
Yasuhira, S., Saito, T. H., Maesawa, C., & Masuda, T. (2012) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.05.006 · Cited by 4
Koltovaya, N. A. (2009) · Russian Journal of Genetics · doi:10.1134/s1022795409010013 · Cited by 4
Details and Concerns Regarding the G2/M DNA Damage Checkpoint in Budding YeastPreprint
Weinert, T. A., Little, E. J., Shanks, L., Admire, A. A., Gardner, R. D., Putnam, C. W., Michelson, R. J., Nyberg, K. A., & Sundareshan, P. (2000) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2000.65.433 · Cited by 4
Li, B.-Z., Kolodner, R. D., & Putnam, C. D. (2024) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkae064 · Cited by 3
Checkpoint Controls Halting the Cell Cycle
Carr, A. M., & Caspari, T. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-10360-9_4 · Cited by 2
Koltovaya, N. A., & Devin, A. B. (2002) · Doklady Biological Sciences · doi:10.1023/a:1021758012136 · Cited by 2
Transcriptomic analysis of nonylphenol effect on Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Bereketoğlu, C., Nacar, G., Sarı, T., Mertoğlu, B., & Pradhan, A. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.10794 · Cited by 1
An Investigation of TDA1 Deficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae During Diauxic Growth
Bjurström, E. Y., Lasin, P., Brunnsåker, D., Tiukova, I., & King, R. D. (2025) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.4004 · Cited by 2
Yeast Rad55-Rad57-SHU paralog complex dynamically promotes Rad51 filament formation
Koo, C. W., Gore, S. K., Ro, S. Y., Liu, J., Yu, C., Azumaya, C. M., Brillantes, B., Zilberleyb, I., Chen, H., Rafiqzada, M. B., et al. (2026) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2026.06.045 · Cited by 1
Self-citationХасанова, О. С., & Khasanov, F. K. (2016) · Molecular Biology · doi:10.7868/s0026898416010067 · Cited by 1
Kinase Cascade of DNA Damage Checkpoint
Koltovaya, N. A. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48838-7_11 · Cited by 1
Checkpoint Control of DNA Repair in Yeast
Fasullo, M. (2021) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.96966 · Cited by 1
Хасанова, О. С., & Khasanov, F. K. (2016) · Molecular Biology · doi:10.1134/s0026893316010064 · Cited by 1
Genetic Analysis of RadB, a Paralogue of the Archaeal Rad51/RecA Homologue, RadA
Haldenby, S. T. (2007) · Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) · Cited by 1
Nyberg, K. A., & Weinert, T. A. (2003) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · doi:10.21236/ada418042 · Cited by 1
Budding Yeast DNA Damage Checkpoint: A Signal Transduction-Mediated Surveillance System
Muzi-Falconi, M., Giannattasio, M., Liberi, G., Pellicioli, A., Plevani, P., & Foiani, M. (2003) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012124546-7/50663-x · Cited by 1
Bennett, C. B., & Resnick, M. A. (2003) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012124546-7/50664-1 · Cited by 1
Xie, B., Sanford, E. J., Hung, S.-H., Wagner, M. M., Heyer, W., & Smolka, M. B. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.11.21.568146 · Cited by 1
Self-citationBennett, C. B. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374145-5.00260-6
Cardone, J. M. (2006) · Americanae (AECID Library)
Ede, C. (2010) · eDiss (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) · doi:10.53846/goediss-3526
The Shu complex is a conserved regulator of Rad51 filament formation
Godin, S. K. (2016) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
SURVEY AND SUMMARY Homologous recombination and its regulation
Krejčí, L., Altmannová, V., Špı́rek, M., & Zhao, X. (2012)
Sonoda, E., Takata, M., Yamashita, Y. M., & Takeda, S. (2016)
Jackson, S. P. (2003) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.1000241.185118
Friedberg, E. C., Walker, G. C., Siede, W., Wood, R. D., Schultz, R. A., & Ellenberger, T. E. (2014) · ASM Press eBooks · doi:10.1128/9781555816704.ch21
Kanaar, R. (2018) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.726379828.793550437
Phosphoregulation of the Rad51 auxiliary factor Swi5-Sfr1Preprint
Liang, P., Lister, K., Yates, L. A., Argunhan, B., & Zhang, X. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.03.23.533938
Extended DNA damage–induced G2/M arrests lead to aberrant mitoses through accumulation of securin
Dubenko, A., Jnied, M., Kotenko, O., & Makovets, S. (2026) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1101/2025.07.21.665839
Role of the Asf1-Rad53 interaction in genomic stability in S.cerevisiae
Jiao, Y. (2011) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/6682a2b6z80c8z49e3z8704zd182d4f122f8
Bianco, J. N. (2010) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/c5c5f7fbz5b45z423ezbc8azeb8ce3450ec3
Mechanistic Study of D-loop Formation during Homologous Recombination by Molecular Microscopy
Tavares, E. M. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/6ffe3f56z1bd9z427dza0e6z4ffcea6a0ae0
Metadata
- Authors
- Bashkirov, V. I., King, J. S., Bashkirova, E. V., Schmuckli-Maurer, J., & Heyer, W.-D.
- Affiliations
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- Institute of General Microbiology
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Heyer, Wolf-Dietrich
- ORCID
- Heyer, Wolf-Dietrich
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4393-4404
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- PMC
- PMC85806
- OpenAlex
- W2121218667
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Molecular and Cellular Biology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- Rad55, DNA damage checkpoint, DNA repair, phosphorylation, recombinational repair, DNA double-strand break repair, methyl methanesulfonate, gamma radiation, ultraviolet radiation, recombination defects, cell cycle arrest, genome stability
- MeSH terms
- DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, DNA, Fungal, Fungal Proteins, Phosphorylation, Recombination, Genetic, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ultraviolet Rays, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review