The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Histone Acetylation at Promoters Is Differentially Affected by Specific Activators and Repressors
Open accessAbstract
We analyzed the relationship between histone acetylation and transcriptional regulation at 40 Saccharomyces cerevisiae promoters that respond to specific activators and repressors. In accord with the general correlation between histone acetylation and transcriptional activity, Gcn4 and the general stress activators (Msn2 and Msn4) cause increased acetylation of histones H3 and H4. Surprisingly, Gal4-dependent activation is associated with a dramatic decrease in histone H4 acetylation, whereas acetylation of histone H3 is unaffected. A specific decrease in H4 acetylation is also observed, to a lesser extent, at promoters activated by Hap4, Adr1, Met4, and Ace1. Activation by heat shock factor has multiple effects; H4 acetylation increases at some promoters, whereas other promoters show an apparent decrease in H3 and H4 acetylation that probably reflects nucleosome loss or gross alteration of chromatin structure. Repression by targeted recruitment of the Sin3-Rpd3 histone deacetylase is associated with decreased H3 and H4 acetylation, whereas repression by Cyc8-Tup1 is associated with decreased H3 acetylation but variable effects on H4 acetylation; this suggests that Cyc8-Tup1 uses multiple mechanisms to reduce histone acetylation at promoters. Thus, individual activators confer distinct patterns of histone acetylation on target promoters, and transcriptional activation is not necessarily associated with increased acetylation. We speculate that the activator-specific decrease in histone H4 acetylation is due to blocking the access or function of an H4-specific histone acetylase such as Esa1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase
Imai, S.-I., Armstrong, C. M., Kaeberlein, M., & Guarente, L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001622 · Cited by 3,510
Histone acetylation in chromatin structure and transcription
Grunstein, M. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/38664 · Cited by 2,884
Histone acetylation and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms
Struhl, K. (1998) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.12.5.599 · Cited by 1,815
Self-citationCell cycle-regulated histone acetylation required for expression of the yeast HO gene
Krebs, J. E., Kuo, M.-H., Allis, C. D., & Peterson, C. L. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.11.1412 · Cited by 275
Histone deacetylase activity of Rpd3 is important for transcriptional repression in vivo
Kadosh, D., & Struhl, K. (1998) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.12.6.797 · Cited by 234
Self-citationWang, L., Liu, L., & Berger, S. L. (1998) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.12.5.640 · Cited by 232
Cited by
Histone deacetylases and cancer: causes and therapies
Marks, P. A., Rifkind, R. A., Richon, V. M., Breslow, R., Miller, T., & Kelly, W. K. (2001) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/35106079 · Cited by 1,866
Functions of Site-Specific Histone Acetylation and Deacetylation
Shahbazian, M. D., & Grunstein, M. (2007) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.052705.162114 · Cited by 1,635
Histone deacetylase inhibitors as new cancer drugs
Marks, P. A., Richon, V. M., Breslow, R., & Rifkind, R. A. (2001) · Current Opinion in Oncology · doi:10.1097/00001622-200111000-00010 · Cited by 531
Zhang, H., Roberts, D. N., & Cairns, B. R. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.036 · Cited by 533
Nucleosome positioning signals in genomic DNA
Peckham, H. E., Thurman, R. E., Fu, Y., Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A., Noble, W. S., Struhl, K., & Weng, Z. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6101007 · Cited by 316
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Deckert, J., & Struhl, K.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2726-2735
- ISSN
- 0270-7306 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5549
- OpenAlex
- W2154708203
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Histone Acetylation at Promoters Is Differentially Affected by Specific Activators and Repressors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mcb.21.8.2726-2735.2001
- The paper
- Deckert, J., & Struhl, K. (2001). Histone Acetylation at Promoters Is Differentially Affected by Specific Activators and Repressors. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.21.8.2726-2735.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.