Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Vav1 Dephosphorylation by the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-1 as a Mechanism for Inhibition of Cellular Cytotoxicity

Stebbins, Christopher C., Watzl, Carsten, Billadeau, Daniel D., Leibson, Paul J., Burshtyn, Deborah N., Long, Eric O.·2003·Molecular and Cellular Biology

Abstract

Here, we present data suggesting a novel mechanism for regulation of natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity through inhibitory receptors. Interaction of activation receptors with their ligands on target cells induces cytotoxicity by NK cells. This activation is under negative control by inhibitory receptors that recruit tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 upon binding major histocompatibility class I on target cells. How SHP-1 blocks the activation pathway is not known. To identify SHP-1 substrates, an HLA-C-specific inhibitory receptor fused to a substrate-trapping mutant of SHP-1 was expressed in NK cells. Phosphorylated Vav1, a regulator of actin cytoskeleton, was the only protein detectably associated with the catalytic site of SHP-1 during NK cell contact with target cells expressing HLA-C. Vav1 trapping was independent of actin polymerization, suggesting that inhibition of cellular cytotoxicity occurs through an early dephosphorylation of Vav1 by SHP-1, which blocks actin-dependent activation signals. Such a mechanism explains how inhibitory receptors can block activating signals induced by different receptors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mcb.23.17.6291-6299.2003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00085-4 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00027-6 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.285.5428.727 · DOI
  4. 10.1084/jem.188.3.549 · DOI
  5. 10.1172/JCI0214843 · DOI
  6. 10.4049/jimmunol.164.8.3971 · DOI
  7. 10.1074/jbc.273.42.27518 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80276-9 · DOI
  9. 10.1084/jem.192.7.1047 · DOI
  10. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.375 · DOI
  11. 10.1084/jem.186.12.1965 · DOI
  12. Burshtyn D. N., 1997, Trends Cell Biol., 7, 473, 10.1016/S0962-8924(97)01167-7 · DOI
  13. Burshtyn D. N., 2000, Curr. Biol., 10, 777, 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00568-6 · DOI
  14. 10.1128/MCB.20.5.1461-1477.2000 · DOI
  15. Carena I., 1997, J. Exp. Med., 186, 1769, 10.1084/jem.186.10.1769 · DOI
  16. 10.1084/jem.194.10.1507 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.201238598 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Chan G. D., 2001, Eur. J. Immunol., 31, 2403, 10.1002/1521-4141(200108)31:8<2403::AID-IMMU2403>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  19. 10.1074/jbc.M101219200 · DOI
  20. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.89 · DOI
  21. 10.1084/jem.193.12.1413 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/ni764 · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.96.26.15062 · DOI
  24. Delon J., 1998, Eur. J. Immunol., 28, 716, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199802)28:02<716::AID-IMMU716>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
  25. 10.1038/35093109 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Dietrich J., 2001, J. Immunol., 166, 2514, 10.4049/jimmunol.166.4.2514 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00120-3 · DOI
  28. Fassett M. S., 2001, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 14547, 10.1073/pnas.211563598 · DOI
  29. Faure M., 2003, J. Immunol., 170, 6107, 10.4049/jimmunol.170.12.6107 · DOI
  30. 10.1073/pnas.94.5.1680 · DOI
  31. Galandrini R., 1999, J. Immunol., 162, 3148, 10.4049/jimmunol.162.6.3148 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/0076-6879(91)01043-2 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1126/science.279.5350.509 · DOI
  34. 10.1128/MCB.17.3.1346 · DOI
  35. 10.1074/jbc.272.2.843 · DOI
  36. 10.1126/science.7540771 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/80859 · DOI
  38. Kaufman D. S., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 6484, 10.1073/pnas.92.14.6484 · DOI
  39. 10.1074/jbc.271.7.3856 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80441-0 · DOI
  41. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.875 · DOI
  42. 10.4049/jimmunol.167.10.5749 · DOI
  43. 10.1126/science.291.5502.319 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1126/science.288.5473.2051 · DOI
  45. Palmieri G., 1999, J. Immunol., 162, 7181, 10.4049/jimmunol.162.12.7181 · DOI
  46. Penninger J. M., 1999, Cell, 96, 9, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80954-X · DOI
  47. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199907)29:07<2223::AID-IMMU2223>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
  48. 10.1126/science.290.5489.84 · DOI
  49. Siminovitch K. A., 1998, Semin. Immunol., 10, 329, 10.1006/smim.1998.0125 · DOI
  50. 10.1083/jcb.200208179 · DOI
  51. 10.1128/MCB.18.7.3838 · DOI
  52. Valiante N. M., 1996, J. Exp. Med., 184, 2243, 10.1084/jem.184.6.2243 · DOI
  53. Vyas Y. M., 2002, J. Immunol., 168, 3150, 10.4049/jimmunol.168.7.3150 · DOI
  54. 10.4049/jimmunol.167.8.4358 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90069-1 · DOI
  56. Wang P., 2002, Biochemistry, 41, 6202, 10.1021/bi025591f · DOI
  57. 10.1084/jem.20020427 · DOI
  58. 10.4049/jimmunol.165.7.3545 · DOI
  59. 10.1084/jem.192.7.1059 · DOI
  60. 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6302 · DOI
  61. Yang J., 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 4066, 10.1074/jbc.275.6.4066 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80032-1 · DOI
  63. 10.1074/jbc.M210028200 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stebbins, C. C., Watzl, C., Billadeau, D. D., Leibson, P. J., Burshtyn, D. N., & Long, E. O.
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Biology
Published
2003-09-01
Volume
23
Issue
17
Pages
6291-6299
ISSN
1098-5549
Cited by
245
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review