The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bypassing Cultivation To Identify Bacterial Species: Culture-independent genomic approaches identify credibly distinct clusters, avoid cultivation bias, and provide true insights into microbial species
Abstract
Whether bacterial species exist as a natural unit remains an unresolved issue, one with important practical challenges, including that of correctly identifying microorganisms and diagnosing the causative agents of microbial diseases. The current bacterial species definition is based on genetic and phenotypic distinctiveness of organisms grouped under the same name.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Svartström, O., Alneberg, J., Terrapon, N., Lombard, V., de Bruijn, I., Malmsten, J., Dalin, A.-M., EL Muller, E., Shah, P., Wilmes, P., et al. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2017.108 · Cited by 161
Integrase-associated niche differentiation of endogenous large DNA viruses in crustaceans
Kawato, S., Nozaki, R., Kondo, H., & Hirono, I. (2024) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00559-23 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodriguez-R, L. M., & Konstantinidis, K. T.
- Venue
- Microbe Magazine
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2014-03-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 111-118
- ISSN
- 1558-7452 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7460
- OpenAlex
- W2563355976
- Cited by
- 698
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
