The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stimulus Perception in Bacterial Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinases
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Two-component signal-transducing systems are ubiquitously distributed communication interfaces in bacteria. They consist of a histidine kinase that senses a specific environmental stimulus and a cognate response regulator that mediates the cellular response, mostly through differential expression of target genes. Histidine kinases are typically transmembrane proteins harboring at least two domains: an input (or sensor) domain and a cytoplasmic transmitter (or kinase) domain. They can be identified and classified by virtue of their conserved cytoplasmic kinase domains. In contrast, the sensor domains are highly variable, reflecting the plethora of different signals and modes of sensing. In order to gain insight into the mechanisms of stimulus perception by bacterial histidine kinases, we here survey sensor domain architecture and topology within the bacterial membrane, functional aspects related to this topology, and sequence and phylogenetic conservation. Based on these criteria, three groups of histidine kinases can be differentiated. (i) Periplasmic-sensing histidine kinases detect their stimuli (often small solutes) through an extracellular input domain. (ii) Histidine kinases with sensing mechanisms linked to the transmembrane regions detect stimuli (usually membrane-associated stimuli, such as ionic strength, osmolarity, turgor, or functional state of the cell envelope) via their membrane-spanning segments and sometimes via additional short extracellular loops. (iii) Cytoplasmic-sensing histidine kinases (either membrane anchored or soluble) detect cellular or diffusible signals reporting the metabolic or developmental state of the cell. This review provides an overview of mechanisms of stimulus perception for members of all three groups of bacterial signal-transducing histidine kinases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Identification of direct residue contacts in protein–protein interaction by message passing
Weigt, M., White, R. A., Szurmant, H., Hoch, J. A., & Hwa, T. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0805923106 · Cited by 1,025
The biology and future prospects of antivirulence therapies
Cegelski, L., Marshall, G. R., Eldridge, G. R., & Hultgren, S. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1818 · Cited by 788
Tremaroli, V., Karlsson, F., Werling, M., Ståhlman, M., Kovatcheva-Datchary, P., Olbers, T., Fändriks, L., le Roux, C. W., Nielsen, J., & Bäckhed, F. (2015) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2015.07.009 · Cited by 757
Molecular Mechanisms of Two-Component Signal Transduction
Zschiedrich, C. P., Keidel, V., & Szurmant, H. (2016) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2016.08.003 · Cited by 540
Stress-Induced Mutagenesis in Bacteria
Foster, P. L. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409230701648494 · Cited by 536
Metadata
- Authors
- Mascher, T., Helmann, J. D., & Unden, G.
- Venue
- Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 910-938
- ISSN
- 1092-2172 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5557
- OpenAlex
- W2107093868
- Cited by
- 721
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stimulus Perception in Bacterial Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.00020-06
- The paper
- Mascher, T., Helmann, J. D., & Unden, G. (2006). Stimulus Perception in Bacterial Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinases. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00020-06
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.