The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbial ureases: significance, regulation, and molecular characterization.
Open accessAbstract
Microbial ureases hydrolyze urea to ammonia and carbon dioxide. Urease activity of an infectious microorganism can contribute to the development of urinary stones, pyelonephritis, gastric ulceration, and other diseases. In contrast to these harmful effects, urease activity of ruminal and gastrointestinal microorganisms can benefit both the microbe and host by recycling (thereby conserving) urea nitrogen. Microbial ureases also play an important role in utilization of environmental nitrogenous compounds and urea-based fertilizers. Urease is a high-molecular-weight, multimeric, nickel-containing enzyme. Its cytoplasmic location requires that urea enter the cell for utilization, and in some species energy-dependent urea uptake systems have been detected. Eucaryotic microorganisms possess a homopolymeric urease, analogous to the well-studied plant enzyme composed of six identical subunits. Gram-positive bacteria may also possess homopolymeric ureases, but the evidence for this is not conclusive. In contrast, ureases from gram-negative bacteria studied thus far clearly possess three distinct subunits with Mrs of 65,000 to 73,000 (alpha), 10,000 to 12,000 (beta), and 8,000 to 10,000 (gamma). Tightly bound nickel is present in all ureases and appears to participate in catalysis. Urease genes have been cloned from several species, and nickel-containing recombinant ureases have been characterized. Three structural genes are transcribed on a single messenger ribonucleic acid and translated in the order gamma, beta, and then alpha. In addition to these genes, several other peptides are encoded in the urease operon of some species. The roles for these other genes are not firmly established, but may involve regulation, urea transport, nickel transport, or nickel processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yung-Chi, C., & Prusoff, W. H. (1973) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0006-2952(73)90196-2 · Cited by 12,922
Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia
Weatherburn, M. W. (1967) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60252a045 · Cited by 4,099
Cited by
Castro-Alonso, M. J., Montañez-Hernandez, L. E., Sanchez-Muñoz, M. A., Macias Franco, M. R., Narayanasamy, R., & Balagurusamy, N. (2019) · Frontiers in Materials · doi:10.3389/fmats.2019.00126 · Cited by 563
Kurtz, C. B., Millet, Y. A., Puurunen, M. K., Perreault, M., Charbonneau, M. R., Isabella, V. M., Kotula, J. W., Antipov, E., Dagon, Y., Denney, W. S., et al. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aau7975 · Cited by 399
The molecular processes of urea hydrolysis in relation to ammonia emissions from agriculture
Sigurdarson, J. J., Svane, S., & Karring, H. (2018) · Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology · doi:10.1007/s11157-018-9466-1 · Cited by 336
Role of urea in microbial metabolism in aquatic systems: a biochemical and molecular review
Solomon, C., Collier, J., Berg, G., & Glibert, P. (2010) · Aquatic Microbial Ecology · doi:10.3354/ame01390 · Cited by 300
Pearson, M. M., Sebaihia, M., Churcher, C., Quail, M. A., Seshasayee, A. S., Luscombe, N. M., Abdellah, Z., Arrosmith, C., Atkin, B., Chillingworth, T., et al. (2008) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.01981-07 · Cited by 265
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mobley, H. L., & Hausinger, R. P.
- Venue
- Microbiological Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-108
- ISSN
- 0146-0749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1912217738
- Cited by
- 1,507
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial ureases: significance, regulation, and molecular characterization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.53.1.85-108.1989
- The paper
- Mobley, H. L., & Hausinger, R. P. (1989). Microbial ureases: significance, regulation, and molecular characterization. Microbiological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.53.1.85-108.1989
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.