The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial phospholipases C
Open accessAbstract
A variety of pathogenic bacteria produce phospholipases C, and since the discovery in 1944 that a bacterial toxin (Clostridium perfringens alpha-toxin) possessed an enzymatic activity, there has been considerable interest in this class of proteins. Initial speculation that all phospholipases C would have lethal properties has not been substantiated. Most of the characterized enzymes fall into one of four groups of structurally related proteins: the zinc-metallophospholipases C, the sphingomyelinases, the phosphatidylinositol-hydrolyzing enzymes, and the pseudomonad phospholipases C. The zinc-metallophospholipases C have been most intensively studied, and lethal toxins within this group possess an additional domain. The toxic phospholipases C can interact with eukaryotic cell membranes and hydrolyze phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin, leading to cell lysis. However, measurement of the cytolytic potential or lethality of phospholipases C may not accurately indicate their roles in the pathogenesis of disease. Subcytolytic concentrations of phospholipase C can perturb host cells by activating the arachidonic acid cascade or protein kinase C. Nonlethal phospholipases C, such as the Listeria monocytogenes PLC-A, appear to enhance the release of the organism from the host cell phagosome. Since some phospholipases C play important roles in the pathogenesis of disease, they could form components of vaccines. A greater understanding of the modes of action and structure-function relationships of phospholipases C will facilitate the interpretation of studies in which these enzymes are used as membrane probes and will enhance the use of these proteins as models for eukaryotic phospholipases C.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clark, J. D., Lin, L.-L., Kriz, R. W., Ramesha, C. S., Sultzman, L. A., Lin, A. Y., Milona, N., & Knopf, J. L. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90556-e · Cited by 1,688
Cited by
Clostridial enteric diseases of domestic animals
Songer, J. G. (1996) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.9.2.216 · Cited by 909
Non-tuberculous mycobacteria and the rise of Mycobacterium abscessus
Johansen, M. D., Herrmann, J.-L., & Kremer, L. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-020-0331-1 · Cited by 822
Potential Role of Phospholipases in Virulence and Fungal Pathogenesis
Ghannoum, M. A. (2000) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.13.1.122 · Cited by 818
Clostridium perfringens in poultry: an emerging threat for animal and public health
Immerseel, F. V., Buck, J. D., Pasmans, F., Huyghebaert, G., Haesebrouck, F., & Ducatelle, R. (2004) · Avian Pathology · doi:10.1080/03079450400013162 · Cited by 656
Clostridium perfringens: toxinotype and genotype
Petit, L., Gibert, M., & Popoff, M. R. (1999) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(98)01430-9 · Cited by 631
Metadata
- Authors
- Titball, R. W.
- Venue
- Microbiological Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1993-01-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 347-366
- ISSN
- 0146-0749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1898896614
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial phospholipases C. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.57.2.347-366.1993
- The paper
- Titball, R. W. (1993). Bacterial phospholipases C. Microbiological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.57.2.347-366.1993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.