The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular Basis of Symbiotic Promiscuity
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Eukaryotes often form symbioses with microorganisms. Among these, associations between plants and nitrogen-fixing bacteria are responsible for the nitrogen input into various ecological niches. Plants of many different families have evolved the capacity to develop root or stem nodules with diverse genera of soil bacteria. Of these, symbioses between legumes and rhizobia (Azorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Mesorhizobium, and Rhizobium) are the most important from an agricultural perspective. Nitrogen-fixing nodules arise when symbiotic rhizobia penetrate their hosts in a strictly controlled and coordinated manner. Molecular codes are exchanged between the symbionts in the rhizosphere to select compatible rhizobia from pathogens. Entry into the plant is restricted to bacteria that have the “keys” to a succession of legume “doors”. Some symbionts intimately associate with many different partners (and are thus promiscuous), while others are more selective and have a narrow host range. For historical reasons, narrow host range has been more intensively investigated than promiscuity. In our view, this has given a false impression of specificity in legume-Rhizobium associations. Rather, we suggest that restricted host ranges are limited to specific niches and represent specialization of widespread and more ancestral promiscuous symbioses. Here we analyze the molecular mechanisms governing symbiotic promiscuity in rhizobia and show that it is controlled by a number of molecular keys.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE ROLE OF ROOT EXUDATES IN RHIZOSPHERE INTERACTIONS WITH PLANTS AND OTHER ORGANISMS
Bais, H. P., Weir, T. L., Perry, L. G., Gilroy, S., & Vivanco, J. M. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105159 · Cited by 4,682
Commensal Host-Bacterial Relationships in the Gut
Hooper, L. V., & Gordon, J. I. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058709 · Cited by 2,362
Diversity of Rhizobium-Phaseolus vulgaris symbiosis: overview and perspectives
Martínez-Romero, E. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1024199013926 · Cited by 1,539
Inter-kingdom signalling: Communication between bacteria and their hosts
Hughes, D. T., & Sperandio, V. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1836 · Cited by 761
Elbeltagy, A., Nishioka, K., Sato, T., Suzuki, H., Ye, B., Hamada, T., Isawa, T., Mitsui, H., & Minamisawa, K. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.11.5285-5293.2001 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Perret, X., Staehelin, C., & Broughton, W. J.
- Venue
- Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 180-201
- ISSN
- 1092-2172 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5557
- OpenAlex
- W2148189241
- Cited by
- 1,037
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Basis of Symbiotic Promiscuity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.64.1.180-201.2000
- The paper
- Perret, X., Staehelin, C., & Broughton, W. J. (2000). Molecular Basis of Symbiotic Promiscuity. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.64.1.180-201.2000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.