The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Virioplankton: Viruses in Aquatic Ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: The discovery that viruses may be the most abundant organisms in natural waters, surpassing the number of bacteria by an order of magnitude, has inspired a resurgence of interest in viruses in the aquatic environment. Surprisingly little was known of the interaction of viruses and their hosts in nature. In the decade since the reports of extraordinarily large virus populations were published, enumeration of viruses in aquatic environments has demonstrated that the virioplankton are dynamic components of the plankton, changing dramatically in number with geographical location and season. The evidence to date suggests that virioplankton communities are composed principally of bacteriophages and, to a lesser extent, eukaryotic algal viruses. The influence of viral infection and lysis on bacterial and phytoplankton host communities was measurable after new methods were developed and prior knowledge of bacteriophage biology was incorporated into concepts of parasite and host community interactions. The new methods have yielded data showing that viral infection can have a significant impact on bacteria and unicellular algae populations and supporting the hypothesis that viruses play a significant role in microbial food webs. Besides predation limiting bacteria and phytoplankton populations, the specific nature of virus-host interaction raises the intriguing possibility that viral infection influences the structure and diversity of aquatic microbial communities. Novel applications of molecular genetic techniques have provided good evidence that viral infection can significantly influence the composition and diversity of aquatic microbial communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reactivation of Ultra-Violet-Inactivated Bacteriophage by Visible Light
DULBECCO, R. (1949) · Nature · doi:10.1038/163949b0 · Cited by 186
Cited by
Ecology of prokaryotic viruses
Weinbauer, M. G. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001 · Cited by 1,771
Microbial community structure and its functional implications
Fuhrman, J. A. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08058 · Cited by 1,382
Kieft, K., Zhou, Z., & Anantharaman, K. (2020) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00867-0 · Cited by 1,123
Harke, M. J., Steffen, M. M., Gobler, C. J., Otten, T. G., Wilhelm, S. W., Wood, S. A., & Paerl, H. W. (2016) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2015.12.007 · Cited by 1,084
Lysogeny in nature: mechanisms, impact and ecology of temperate phages
Howard-Varona, C., Hargreaves, K. R., Abedon, S. T., & Sullivan, M. B. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2017.16 · Cited by 894
Metadata
- Authors
- Wommack, K. E., & Colwell, R. R.
- Venue
- Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-114
- ISSN
- 1092-2172 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5557
- OpenAlex
- W2098132478
- Cited by
- 2,160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Virioplankton: Viruses in Aquatic Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.64.1.69-114.2000
- The paper
- Wommack, K. E., & Colwell, R. R. (2000). Virioplankton: Viruses in Aquatic Ecosystems. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.64.1.69-114.2000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.