The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diversity in Chemotaxis Mechanisms among the Bacteria and Archaea
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: The study of chemotaxis describes the cellular processes that control the movement of organisms toward favorable environments. In bacteria and archaea, motility is controlled by a two-component system involving a histidine kinase that senses the environment and a response regulator, a very common type of signal transduction in prokaryotes. Most insights into the processes involved have come from studies of Escherichia coli over the last three decades. However, in the last 10 years, with the sequencing of many prokaryotic genomes, it has become clear that E. coli represents a streamlined example of bacterial chemotaxis. While general features of excitation remain conserved among bacteria and archaea, specific features, such as adaptational processes and hydrolysis of the intracellular signal CheY-P, are quite diverse. The Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis system is considerably more complex and appears to be similar to the one that existed when the bacteria and archaea separated during evolution, so that understanding this mechanism should provide insight into the variety of mechanisms used today by the broad sweep of chemotactic bacteria and archaea. However, processes even beyond those used in E. coli and B. subtilis have been discovered in other organisms. This review emphasizes those used by B. subtilis and these other organisms but also gives an account of the mechanism in E. coli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacterial chemoreceptors: high-performance signaling in networked arrays
Hazelbauer, G. L., Falke, J. J., & Parkinson, J. S. (2008) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2007.09.014 · Cited by 632
Molecular Mechanisms of Two-Component Signal Transduction
Zschiedrich, C. P., Keidel, V., & Szurmant, H. (2016) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2016.08.003 · Cited by 540
Self-citationMolecular communication in the rhizosphere
Faure, D., Vereecke, D., & Leveau, J. H. J. (2009) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-008-9839-2 · Cited by 199
Bible, A. N., Stephens, B. B., Ortega, D. R., Xie, Z., & Alexandre, G. (2008) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00734-08 · Cited by 79
Beyond Homeostasis: A Predictive-Dynamic Framework for Understanding Cellular Behavior
Freddolino, L., & Tavazoie, S. (2012) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154129 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Szurmant, H., & Ordal, G. W.
- Venue
- Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301-319
- ISSN
- 1092-2172 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5557
- OpenAlex
- W2154370940
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity in Chemotaxis Mechanisms among the Bacteria and Archaea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mmbr.68.2.301-319.2004
- The paper
- Szurmant, H., & Ordal, G. W. (2004). Diversity in Chemotaxis Mechanisms among the Bacteria and Archaea. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.68.2.301-319.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.