The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interpreting and reporting 40Ar/39Ar geochronologic data
Open accessAbstract
The 40Ar/39Ar dating method is among the most versatile of geochronometers, having the potential to date a broad variety of K-bearing materials spanning from the time of Earth’s formation into the historical realm. Measurements using modern noble-gas mass spectrometers are now producing 40Ar/39Ar dates with analytical uncertainties of ∼0.1%, thereby providing precise time constraints for a wide range of geologic and extraterrestrial processes. Analyses of increasingly smaller subsamples have revealed age dispersion in many materials, including some minerals used as neutron fluence monitors. Accordingly, interpretive strategies are evolving to address observed dispersion in dates from a single sample. Moreover, inferring a geologically meaningful “age” from a measured “date” or set of dates is dependent on the geological problem being addressed and the salient assumptions associated with each set of data. We highlight requirements for collateral information that will better constrain the interpretation of 40Ar/39Ar data sets, including those associated with single-crystal fusion analyses, incremental heating experiments, and in situ analyses of microsampled domains. To ensure the utility and viability of published results, we emphasize previous recommendations for reporting 40Ar/39Ar data and the related essential metadata, with the amendment that data conform to evolving standards of being findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) by both humans and computers. Our examples provide guidance for the presentation and interpretation of 40Ar/39Ar dates to maximize their interdisciplinary usage, reproducibility, and longevity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crank, J. (1956) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 18,978
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., et al. (2016) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · Cited by 18,423
Park, G. S. (1975) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/0032-3861(75)90130-5 · Cited by 14,967
Subcommission on geochronology: Convention on the use of decay constants in geo- and cosmochronology
Steiger, R. H., & Jäger, E. (1977) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(77)90060-7 · Cited by 9,994
The ASA Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108 · Cited by 6,306
IsoplotR: A free and open toolbox for geochronology
Vermeesch, P. (2018) · Geoscience Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001 · Cited by 3,537
Self-citationScientists rise up against statistical significance
Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9 · Cited by 2,983
Closure temperature in cooling geochronological and petrological systems
Dodson, M. H. (1973) · Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology · doi:10.1007/bf00373790 · Cited by 2,555
Intercalibration of standards, absolute ages and uncertainties in 40Ar/39Ar dating
Renne, P. R., Swisher, C. C., Deino, A. L., Karner, D. B., Owens, T. L., & DePaolo, D. J. (1998) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/s0009-2541(97)00159-9 · Cited by 1,788
Self-citationHemming, S. R. (2004) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2003rg000128 · Cited by 1,526
Self-citation
Cited by
An appraisal of the ages of Phanerozoic large igneous provinces
Jiang, Q., Jourdan, F., Olierook, H. K. H., & Merle, R. E. (2023) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104314 · Cited by 61
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaen, A. J., Jicha, B. R., Hodges, K. V., Vermeesch, P., Stelten, M. E., Mercer, C. M., Phillips, D., Rivera, T. A., Jourdan, F., Matchan, E. L., Hemming, S. R., Morgan, L. E., Kelley, S. P., Cassata, W. S., Heizler, M. T., Vasconcelos, P. M., Benowitz, J. A., Koppers, A. A. P., Mark, D. F., Niespolo, E. M., Sprain, C. J., Hames, W. E., Kuiper, K. F., Turrin, B. D., Renne, P. R., Ross, J., Nomade, S., Guillou, H., Webb, L. E., Cohen, B. A., Calvert, A. T., Joyce, N., Ganerød, M., Wijbrans, J., Ishizuka, O., He, H., Ramirez, A., Pfänder, J. A., Lopez-Martínez, M., Qiu, H., & Singer, B. S.
- Venue
- GSA Bulletin
- Publisher
- Geological Society of America
- Published
- 2020-07-01
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 461-487
- ISSN
- 0016-7606 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2674
- OpenAlex
- W3040262563
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 148
- FWCI
- 19.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interpreting and reporting 40Ar/39Ar geochronologic data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1130/b35560.1
- The paper
- Schaen, A. J., Jicha, B. R., Hodges, K. V., Vermeesch, P., Stelten, M. E., Mercer, C. M., Phillips, D., Rivera, T. A., Jourdan, F., Matchan, E. L., Hemming, S. R., Morgan, L. E., Kelley, S. P., Cassata, W. S., Heizler, M. T., Vasconcelos, P. M., Benowitz, J. A., Koppers, A. A. P., Mark, D. F., . . . Singer, B. S. (2021). Interpreting and reporting 40Ar/39Ar geochronologic data. GSA Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1130/b35560.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.