Cited by 2,983Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic Publishing and Open AccessStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Scientists rise up against statistical significance

Open access
Amrhein, Valentin, Greenland, Sander, McShane, Blake·2019·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Amrhein, Valentin
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-03-20
Volume
567
Issue
7748
Pages
305-307
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2924950986
Cited by
2,983
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 252 · 2025: 308 · 2024: 311 · 2023: 343 · 2022: 429 · 2021: 481 · 2020: 531 · 2019: 322 · 2018: 4
FWCI
282.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
statistical significance, p-values, research integrity, publication bias, hypothesis testing, scientific claims
MeSH terms
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Humans, Probability, Research Design, Statistics as Topic, Models, Statistical, Confidence Intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review