Cited by 309Geological and Geochemical AnalysisPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsAstro and Planetary Science

Re-Os geochronology of postglacial black shales in Australia: Constraints on the timing of “Sturtian” glaciation

Open access
Kendall, Brian, Creaser, Robert A., Selby, David·2006·Geology

Abstract

Research Article| September 01, 2006 Re-Os geochronology of postglacial black shales in Australia: Constraints on the timing of "Sturtian" glaciation Brian Kendall; Brian Kendall 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, 1-26 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Robert A. Creaser; Robert A. Creaser 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, 1-26 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David Selby David Selby 2Department of Earth Sciences, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Geology (2006) 34 (9): 729–732. https://doi.org/10.1130/G22775.1 Article history received: 02 Mar 2006 rev-recd: 30 Mar 2006 accepted: 11 Apr 2006 first online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Brian Kendall, Robert A. Creaser, David Selby; Re-Os geochronology of postglacial black shales in Australia: Constraints on the timing of "Sturtian" glaciation. Geology 2006;; 34 (9): 729–732. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G22775.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/g22775.1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The maximum for the origin of crown-group demosponges is the first appearance of demosponge-specific biomarkers, sometime after the Sturtian, ca 657 Myr ago.

    “Fifth, the maximum for the origin of crown-group demosponges, is the first appearance of demosponge-specific biomarkers (McCaffrey et al. 1994; Love et al. 2006; see Peterson et al. 2007 for discussion), sometime after the Sturtian, ca 657 Myr ago (Kendall et al. 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kendall, B., Creaser, R. A., & Selby, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Durham University (GB)
Venue
Geology
Published
2006
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
729
ISSN
0091-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017935781
Cited by
309
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
23.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Geology (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
Sturtian glaciation, Neoproterozoic glaciation, Re-Os geochronology, glacial deposits, Neoproterozoic stratigraphy, glacial-interglacial cycles, South Australia, Central Australia, Precambrian stratigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review