Cited by 259Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeological and Geochemical AnalysisGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis

Re–Os and Mo isotope systematics of black shales from the Middle Proterozoic Velkerri and Wollogorang Formations, McArthur Basin, northern Australia

Kendall, Brian, Creaser, Robert A., Gordon, Gwyneth W., Anbar, Ariel D.·2009·Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gca.2009.02.013

Cites

145 of 145 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Re-Os dating can give precise depositional ages for black shales while also verifying that redox-sensitive trace elements escaped major post-depositional alteration.

    “the Re-Os radioactive isotope system can provide precise and accurate depositional ages for black shales and, at the same time, confirm that redox-sensitive trace elements have not been significantly affected by post-depositional processes (e.g., Kendall et al., 2009).”

    From Trace elements at the intersection of marine biological and geochemical evolution (2016) · cites this paper as Kendall et al., 2009

  • A similar conclusion of euxinia for the late Paleoproterozoic and early Mesoproterozoic ocean was drawn from Fe speciation and Mo concentration and isotope data from the Rove and Velkerri formations.

    “A similar conclusion was drawn for the late Paleoproterozoic and early Mesoproterozoic ocean based on sedimentary Fe speciation and Mo concentration and isotope data from the ca.1.8 Ga Rove Formation (Canada) and ca.1.4 Ga Velkerri Formation (Australia)”

    From Trace elements at the intersection of marine biological and geochemical evolution (2016) · cites this paper as Kendall et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 146 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kendall, B., Creaser, R. A., Gordon, G. W., & Anbar, A. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kendall, Brian
Venue
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
73
Issue
9
Pages
2534-2558
ISSN
0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087272845
Cited by
259
References
146
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Keywords
molybdenum isotopes, Re-Os geochronology, euxinia, Mesoproterozoic, Paleoproterozoic, Velkerri Formation, McArthur Basin, pyritization, molybdate reduction, mass balance model, organic-rich shale, biomarkers, acritarchs, microfossils

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review