Cited by 208Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Cambrian Burgess Shale–type deposits share a common mode of fossilization

Gaines, Robert R., Briggs, Derek E.G., Yuanlong, Zhao·2008·Geology

Abstract

Although Cambrian Burgess Shale–type (BST) biotas are fundamental to understanding the radiation of metazoans, the nature of their extraordinary preservation remains controversial. There remains disagreement about the importance of the role of early mineral replication of soft tissues versus the conservation of primary organic remains. Most prior work focused on soft-bodied fossils from the two most important BST biotas, those of the Burgess Shale (Canada) and Maotianshan Shale (Chengjiang, China). Fossils from these two deposits do not provide ideal candidates for specimen-level taphonomic study because they have been altered: the Burgess Shale by greenschist facies metamorphism and the Maotianshan Shale by intensive subsurface weathering. Elemental mapping of soft-bodied fossils from 11 other BST deposits worldwide demonstrates that BST preservation represents a single major taphonomic pathway that may share a common cause wherever it occurs. The conservation of organic tissues, and not early authigenic mineralization, is the primary mechanism responsible for the preservation of BST assemblages. Early authigenic mineral replacement preserves certain anatomical features of some specimens, but the preservation of non-biomineralized BST fossils requires suppression of the processes that normally lead to the degradation of organic remains in marine environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/g24961a.1

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A singular primary mode of preservation is shared among Burgess Shale-type deposits worldwide, with soft tissues preserved as carbonaceous remains.

    “It has recently been demonstrated that a singular primary mode of preservation is shared among BST deposits worldwide. Soft-tissues, including cuticle, guts, eyes and gills are preserved as carbonaceous remains (3, 4)”

    From Mechanism for Burgess Shale-type preservation (2012) · cites this paper as [3]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaines, R. R., Briggs, D. E. G., & Yuanlong, Z.
Affiliations
  • Pomona College (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Guizhou University (CN)
Venue
Geology
Published
2008
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
755
ISSN
0091-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162666312
Cited by
208
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geology (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship - Claremont (Claremont Colleges) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Cambrian fossils, soft-bodied fossils, fossilization, taphonomy, authigenic mineralization, organic preservation, elemental mapping, greenschist facies metamorphism, Chengjiang biota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review