Cited by 116Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Burgess Shale-type fossils from a Lower Cambrian shallow-shelf sequence in northwestern Canada

Butterfield, Nicholas J.·1994·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/369477a0

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Butterfield, N. J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Butterfield, Nicholas J.
Venue
Nature
Published
1994-06
Volume
369
Issue
6480
Pages
477-479
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2007107613
Cited by
114
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
12.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Lower Cambrian, Cambrian explosion, taphonomy, microplankton, Northwest Territories

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review