Cited by 84Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

Age of the Laschamp excursion determined by U-Th dating of a speleothem geomagnetic record from North America

Open access

Abstract

The Laschamp geomagnetic excursion was the first short-lived polarity event recognized and described in the paleomagnetic record, and to date remains the most studied geomagnetic event of its kind. In addition to its geophysical significance, the Laschamp is an important global geochronologic marker. The Laschamp excursion occurred around the time of the demise of Homo neanderthalensis, in conjunction with high-amplitude, rapid climatic oscillations leading into the Last Glacial Maximum, and coeval with a major supervolcano eruption in the Mediterranean. Thus, precise determination of the timing and duration of the Laschamp excursion would help in elucidating major scientific questions situated at the intersection of geology, paleoclimatology, and anthropology. Here we present a North American speleothem geomagnetic record of the Laschamp excursion that is directly dated using a combination of high-precision 230Th dates and annual layer counting using confocal microscopy. We have determined a maximum excursion duration that spans the interval 42,250-39,700 yr BP, and an age of 41,100 ± 350 yr BP for the main phase of the excursion, during which the virtual geomagnetic pole was situated at the southernmost latitude in the record. Our chronology provides the first age bracketing of the Laschamp excursion using radioisotopic dating, and improves on previous age determinations based on 40Ar/39Ar dating of lava flows, and orbitally-tuned sedimentary and ice-core records.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/g37490.1

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rise in Δ14C in IntCal20 is coincident within dating uncertainties with the beginning of the Laschamp geomagnetic excursion as recorded in a Missouri stalagmite.

    “The rise in Δ 14 C in IntCal20 is coincident within dating uncertainties with the beginning of the Laschamp geomagnetic excursion as recorded in a Missouri stalagmite (Lascu et al. 2016).”

    From The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP) (2020) · cites this paper as Lascu et al. 2016

    The Introduction identifies a Laschamp record from a Missouri speleothem, and the Abstract dates the excursion’s maximum span to 42.25–39.70 ka B.P. The paper does not compare its beginning with a rise in Δ14C in IntCal20, so it does not establish the claimed coincidence within dating uncertainties. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The highest Δ14C values in IntCal20 correspond within dating uncertainties to the timing of the main phase of the Laschamp Event at 41.10 ± 0.35 ka BP, which is within 1σ of the timing of the event in GLOPIS.

    “The highest Δ 14 C values in IntCal20 also correspond within dating uncertainties to the timing of the main phase of the Laschamp Event at 41.10 ± 0.35 ka BP (Lascu et al. 2016) which is within 1 σ of the timing of the event in GLOPIS (Laj et al. 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Channell, 2012, ODP Site 1063 (Bermuda Rise) revisited: Oxygen isotopes, excursions and paleointensity in the Brunhes Chron: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 13, Q02001

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lascu, I., Feinberg, J. M., Dorale, J. A., Cheng, H., & Edwards, R. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Geology
Published
2016-01-04
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
139-142
ISSN
  • 0091-7613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2682
OpenAlex
W2232994685
Cited by
84
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geology (publishedVersion)
  • Department of Earth Sciences EPrints Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
Laschamp geomagnetic excursion, speleothems, U-Th dating, magnetic field reversal, virtual geomagnetic poles, Last Glacial Maximum, Neanderthal extinction, North America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review