Cited by 573Geological and Geophysical StudiesGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin Americaearthquake and tectonic studies

Some simple physical aspects of the support, structure, and evolution of mountain belts

Molnar, Peter, Lyon-Caen, Hélène·1988·Processes in Continental Lithospheric Deformation

Abstract

We review separately aspects of two types of forces that resist mountain building and therefore that affect the support, deep structure, and evolution of mountain ranges, using observations from the large-scale tectonics of Asia and the Andes to illustrate them. The first such force might be termed mechanical strength. In its simplest description, the lithosphère is flexed as an elastic plate under the weight of a mountain range thrust on top of the lithosphère. The gross shapes of foredeep basins and gravity anomalies over them show that the simple analyses, in terms of elastic plates over inviscid fluids, are reasonable first approximations. At the same time, the weights of some mountain ranges are inadequate to depress lithospheric plates to the depths of neighboring foredeep basins, and the weights of others would create deeper foredeep basins than observed if additional forces were not present. Thus, the strength of the lithosphère alone does not support all ranges. The strength of the lithosphère, however, does affect the geometry of major, deeply rooted thrust faults, which seem to behave as crustal-scale ramp-overthrust faults. Seismic activity seems to be concentrated on the steeper, deeper sections, whereas slip on the flatter planes parallel to the underthrusting basement seems to occur aseismically. The second force that resists mountain building is gravity; the forces that drive two plates together and that cause crustal thickening must do work against gravity. M…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/spe218-p179

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The major driving force is tectonic compression associated with continued plate convergence, largely balanced by gravitational buoyancy force arising from the isostatically supported elevation of the mountain ranges.

    “The major driving force is tectonic compression associated with the continued plate convergence, which is largely balanced by the gravitational buoyancy force arising from the isostatically supported elevation of the mountain ranges [Dalmayrac and Molnar, 1981; Molnar and Lyon-Caen, 1988].”

    From Crustal shortening in the Andes: Why do GPS rates differ from geological rates? (2000) · cites this paper as Molnar and Lyon-Caen, 1988

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molnar, P., & Lyon-Caen, H.
Venue
Processes in Continental Lithospheric Deformation
Published
1988
Pages
179-208
OpenAlex
W2340659542
Cited by
573
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
15.02
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geological Society of America eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
Keywords
orogenic belts, orogeny, lithospheric strength, foredeep basin, gravity anomalies, thrust faults, aseismic slip, gravitational potential energy, isostasy, crustal thickening, high plateaus, crustal extension, crustal shortening, compressive stress, Andes, Asia, tectonic evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review